Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.054 *** Headers from flex

2013-06-11 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 06/11/2013 07:57 PM, Simon Richter wrote: Hi, I have a project where I let flex generate a header file -- however ylwrap throws this file away. According to bugs #8844 and #9933 this should work now -- is that a regression, or have the bugs been closed before the updated code made it

*** SPAM LEVEL 4.054 *** Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.054 *** Headers from flex

2013-06-11 Thread Simon Richter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 11.06.2013 20:16, Stefano Lattarini wrote: Sorry for the dumb question, but: which version of Automake are you using? And: are you sure the ylwrap script are you using is actually in sync with that version? Sorry for being unclear --

Re: spam

2003-06-18 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Bob == Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bob Hi, Bob Is there some sort of Email filter you guys could use to Bob keep spam at a minimum. It seems like the automake mailing list Bob recieves a lot of spam ( in comparison to other mailing lists ). spam is filtered globally on all gnu.org

Re: spam

2002-05-17 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:15:07PM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: Dan IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers. Dan I thought it already did. I agree, however I think the current stable version of Mailman (2.0.x) currently only allows the list admin to hold

RE: spam

2002-05-16 Thread Skip Montanaro
Dan IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers. Dan I thought it already did. I agree, however I think the current stable version of Mailman (2.0.x) currently only allows the list admin to hold messages, which then have to be reviewed by a human. I don't know if

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread christoph.wiedemann
proski Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from proski http://spamassassin.org/ Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am not the system administrator) proski Please keep in mind that Automake developers don't have access to the proski mailing

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread Skip Montanaro
proski Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it proski from http://spamassassin.org/ christoph Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am christoph not the system administrator) I use SA. With its default settings many of the recent

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hi! [Sorry for offtopic, but since Christoph wants to discuss this in the list, I don't want readers to see only his replies, but not mine] proski Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it from proski http://spamassassin.org/ Not everybody has the possibility to

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread Justin Kirby
I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I was having... (figured it out without have to post I think)... But I would like to interject my $0.02 in this... I am subscribed to a TON of lists, all of them require you to subscribe in order to post. This is generally considered a

RE: spam

2002-05-14 Thread Dan Kegel
and animations of people f**king landing in my mailbox... anything to stop spam is all right by me. - Dan -Original Message- From: Justin Kirby To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 5/14/2002 3:34 PM Subject: Re: spam I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I was having... (figured

Re: spam

2002-05-14 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 03:54:52PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: IMHO the mailing list should reject messages from nonsubscribers. I thought it already did. Every project considering doing this needs to ask themselves whether they are prepared to miss out on bug reports as a result. This is a fact

Re: spam hell

2002-01-30 Thread Mats Lidell
Lars wrote: Lars [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that Lars currently gets through without closing the list so only Lars subscribers can post Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to post

Re: spam hell

2002-01-30 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Mats Lidell wrote: : Lars wrote: : Lars [...] it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that : Lars currently gets through without closing the list so only : Lars subscribers can post : : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to

Re: spam hell

2002-01-30 Thread Akim Demaille
Rupert == Rupert Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rupert Lars J. Aas wrote: : Why not close the list then? IMHO it's so easy and fast to join the : list so that requiring that you are a member if you want to post is : OK. I wouldn't mind this personally, but I seem to remember there were

Re: spam hell

2002-01-30 Thread F J Franklin
There is no point in debating about spam here, it becomes spam by itself. Especially if you receive every e-mail twice... Frank Francis James Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and wrong and then, on careful reconsideration,

Re: spam hell

2002-01-29 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 09:46:26AM +, F J Franklin wrote: : Please do something about this deluge of spam! It's driving me nuts! We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through without closing

Re: spam hell

2002-01-29 Thread F J Franklin
We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering Thank you for that, at least. BTW, it's driving me nuts too, but I'm out of filtering ideas... Allow only messages containing the line Dear Automake,? Maybe not. Regards, Frank Francis James Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: spam hell

2002-01-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello! We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through without closing the list so only subscribers can post or moderating the postings from non-subscribers. Nobody is interested in the

Re: spam hell

2002-01-29 Thread Lars J. Aas
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:10:25AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: : Hello! : : We've stopped most of the shit from Korea based on simple filtering, but : it's impossible (or close to) to stop the spam that currently gets through : without closing the list so only subscribers can post or

Re: spam hell

2002-01-29 Thread Akim Demaille
Have a look at `spamassassin', it works great. Look at the following folder, last erased Jan 12th, which it made thanks to the following bits of .procmailrc: :0fw | spamassassin -P :0e { EXITCODE=$? } :0: * ^X-Spam-Flag: YES caughtspam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get ready to see BIGGEST teen

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Allan Clark
One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that requires that all posters are members of the list. Invites may be required. Or... GNU could extend their mailinglists to require authentication on their website and membership

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
"Allan" == Allan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup Allan grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that Allan requires that all posters are members of the list. We can't move the list. Maybe we could convince the GNU

Re: Spam (was: »ç¹«¿ë°¡±¸ Á¾ÇÕ¼îÇθôÀÔ´Ï´Ù.)

2001-03-07 Thread Stephan Kulow
Tom Tromey wrote: "Allan" == Allan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan One alternative is to go to whatever egroup.com is now. Egroup Allan grew from bigfoot or something, it's a list-server that Allan requires that all posters are members of the list. We can't move the list.