On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> Why not just:
>
> ./configure CC="$PWD/../../llvm-arm-toolchain-ship/3.8/bin/clang"
>
> which turns your relative name into an absolute one?
>
> Do you HAVE to have the canonical name?
It just makes the log messages nicer to read.
On 08/09/2017 12:02 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
> wrote:
>>
>> Passing a relative path to CC seems error prone since it only applies to the
>> current working directory and will fail as soon as any Makefile recurses.
>
> Maybe you have a better answer t
On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
>
> Passing a relative path to CC seems error prone since it only applies to the
> current working directory and will fail as soon as any Makefile recurses.
Maybe you have a better answer to this related question: is there a portable
alternat
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Warren Young wrote:
On Aug 7, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Dharmil Shah wrote:
I followed your suggestions and hence I am able to compile my package using
the llvm compiler.
I hope you chose option 3.
On re-reading that email, I think option 2 is wrong, or at least, it isn’t what
On Aug 7, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Dharmil Shah wrote:
>
> I followed your suggestions and hence I am able to compile my package using
> the llvm compiler.
I hope you chose option 3.
On re-reading that email, I think option 2 is wrong, or at least, it isn’t what
I meant to write:
$ ./configure
Warren,
I followed your suggestions and hence I am able to compile my package using
the llvm compiler.
Thanks!
Dharmil
--
View this message in context:
http://gnu-automake.7480.n7.nabble.com/Warning-non-POSIX-variable-name-tp22506p22510.html
Sent from the Gnu - Automake - General mailing lis
On Aug 7, 2017, at 5:17 AM, Dharmil Shah wrote:
>
> I did something like this:
>
> CC=${CC - /../../llvm-arm-toolchain-ship/3.8/bin/clang}
I don’t know that syntax, and due to its form, I’ve failed to Google up a
reference to it, so I don’t know what exactly it is you’re trying to accomplish.
