Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Paul Hammant wrote: > > Look at ant.properties and satisfy ... > > # - Java Service Wrapper, version 2.2.8 or later - > #wrapper.windows.home=../wrapper_win32_2.2.8 > #wrapper.unix.home=../wrapper_linux_2.2.8 > #wrapper.windows.jar=${wrapper.windows.home}/lib/wrapper.jar > > # Linux/Sola

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Ulrich, > OK, it is in the 402 branch. > > Let me know what you think. All my tests pass. Checked it out, built it (target dist-lite-wrapper), ran it and got a class not found exception: org/apache/avalon/phoenix/launcher/DaemonLauncher A different issue dude. Look at ant.properties and sat

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 18:43, Paul Hammant wrote: > Peter, Ulrich, > > >Though it would be nice to release a phopenix soon with these things > > fixed. Paul? > > Will find time to slot it in, given seasonal parties, hic kool - sometime mid Jan then ? -- Cheers, Peter Donald ---

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Peter, Ulrich, Though it would be nice to release a phopenix soon with these things fixed. Paul? Will find time to slot it in, given seasonal parties, hic - Paul -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 23:38, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > > The patches were not applied on the release branch which means they wont > > be in the 4.0.* releases but will be in 4.1.* release. > > Just out of curiosity: was there a certain strategy behind not applying > the patch to the release branch? We

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Paul Hammant wrote: > Ulrich, > > OK, it is in the 402 branch. > > Let me know what you think. All my tests pass. Checked it out, built it (target dist-lite-wrapper), ran it and got a class not found exception: org/apache/avalon/phoenix/launcher/DaemonLauncher Indeed, the class is not in phoeni

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Ulrich, Yeah, revisions 1.20 and 1.21 of org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager/MX4JSystemManager.java: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-avalon-phoenix/src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager/MX4JSystemManager.java?rev=1.21&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup and http

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Paul Hammant wrote: > > Ulrich, > > Maybe we should apply patches to the 4.0.x branch. Could you perhaps > help me identify the actual patches needed? Yeah, revisions 1.20 and 1.21 of org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager/MX4JSystemManager.java: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-av

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Ulrich, Maybe we should apply patches to the 4.0.x branch. Could you perhaps help me identify the actual patches needed? Incidentally, there are many companies live with 4.0.2 and happy with the fact that they have to port-forward or Windows-Terminal-Services to the machine to manage it. - P

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Peter Donald wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 02:22, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > > Ulrich Mayring wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > the MX4J webserver always binds to localhost, no matter whether I > > > specify a in kernel.xml or not. How can I bind to > > > another hostname? Localhost is not too useful

Re: New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 02:22, Ulrich Mayring wrote: > Ulrich Mayring wrote: > > Hello, > > > > the MX4J webserver always binds to localhost, no matter whether I > > specify a in kernel.xml or not. How can I bind to > > another hostname? Localhost is not too useful for remote management :) > > Apparen

New Phoenix Release? (was: Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report)

Ulrich Mayring wrote: Hello, the MX4J webserver always binds to localhost, no matter whether I specify a in kernel.xml or not. How can I bind to another hostname? Localhost is not too useful for remote management :) Apparently something's wrong with the release system?!? There was a patch su

Phoenix 4.0.2 Bug Report

Hello, the MX4J webserver always binds to localhost, no matter whether I specify a in kernel.xml or not. How can I bind to another hostname? Localhost is not too useful for remote management :) Kind regards, Ulrich -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional com