Re: [Avogadro-devel] Selection tool progress

2016-11-21 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> is much nicer than how we did it before, and it seems like it would be >> simple to add to CJSON. > > I think it's a good idea to add selection to CJSON for a few reasons. One, > the concept of "named

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Selection tool progress

2016-11-21 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> is much nicer than how we did it before, and it seems like it would be > simple to add to CJSON. I think it's a good idea to add selection to CJSON for a few reasons. One, the concept of "named selections" was in Avo1 but never really used. For example, an enhanced QM (or other) generator