Re: [Avogadro-devel] Hello GSoC-2016

2016-03-14 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Reinis Danne wrote: > Two questions came up (Python binding project). > > 1. Is it ok to relay on C++11 compiler? A search showed that > there was this discussion before and it was decided that it is ok > to rely on the presence of C++11

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Hello GSoC-2016

2016-03-14 Thread Reinis Danne
Two questions came up (Python binding project). 1. Is it ok to relay on C++11 compiler? A search showed that there was this discussion before and it was decided that it is ok to rely on the presence of C++11 compiler. But in the same time I saw some recent commits specifically removing reliance

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Hello GSoC-2016

2016-03-07 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: >> I'm interested in the project "Python script bindings in Avogadro >> 2". I see that there is already a boost-python branch for >> avogadrolibs. Are you already settled on boost-python or are >> other solutions

Re: [Avogadro-devel] Hello GSoC-2016

2016-03-07 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> I'm interested in the project "Python script bindings in Avogadro > 2". I see that there is already a boost-python branch for > avogadrolibs. Are you already settled on boost-python or are > other solutions still considered? Other solutions are definitely open. Indeed, that’s the key question