Re: [Avogadro-Discuss] paid modeling work and/or tutor

2016-11-10 Thread Geoffrey Hutchison
> Great, thank you for offering guidance. I used avogadro 1 to calculate the > energy at [Energy = 9,515.9 kJ/mol]. The wiki does not detail exactly what > is meant by this figure. What is the context for the kJ/mol figure? This depends on what force field you used (likely UFF). It’s a

Re: [Avogadro-Discuss] paid modeling work and/or tutor

2016-11-10 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Tim Potter wrote: > Thank you so much for your offer to help. I'm happy to help user document > avogadro when you get to that point. I started trying avogadro 2 because > avogadro 1 was not saving double bonds, and was also not aware

Re: [Avogadro-Discuss] paid modeling work and/or tutor

2016-11-10 Thread Tim Potter
Hi Marcus Thank you so much for your offer to help. I'm happy to help user document avogadro when you get to that point. I started trying avogadro 2 because avogadro 1 was not saving double bonds, and was also not aware that avogadro 1 had these extension capabilities. I saved the file in CML

Re: [Avogadro-Discuss] paid modeling work and/or tutor

2016-11-09 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Tim Potter wrote: > Hello > > I'm very slowly working through making avogadro2 functional to calculate > electron density, bond strain, and total energy for a new carbon molecule. Avogadro 1 and 2 provide a method of generating input for