Update of patch #4461 (project avr-libc):
Status:None = Done
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Patch applied to
Update of patch #5377 (project avr-libc):
Priority: 5 - Normal = 7 - High
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?5377
___
Update of patch #4829 (project avr-libc):
Priority: 5 - Normal = 7 - High
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Support for the ATmega256x devices are already in GNU Binutils (2.17+) and
now in avr-libc
Update of patch #3729 (project avr-libc):
Priority: 5 - Normal = 9 - Immediate
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?3729
___
Update of task #3693 (project avr-libc):
Percent Complete: 50% = 90%
___
Follow-up Comment #10:
All that is left is support for ATmega2560 and ATmega2561 in GCC. Patch is
available in Patch
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #17728 (project avr-libc):
If this is really the log from a pristine run (i. e. after a
make clean), there are several things fishy here:
make[4]: Entering directory `/c/avrdev/avrlibc/avr-libc/doc/examples/demo'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `dox'.
(etc. pp.)
Follow-up Comment #1, task #4355 (project avr-libc):
Patch for GCC to implement RTL prologues/epilogues does not demand these
changes.
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue ver.3:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2006-08/msg00015.html
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Eric Weddington; Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #17728] Errors building documentation in MinGW
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #17728 (project
As Eric Weddington wrote:
Good eye. I didn't catch on that it was the same list of files. Now
why would doxygen barf on those?
make seems to have some kind of troubles with them as well. I can't
see your environment, so perhaps you can analyze that a bit. Perhaps
it's some confusion
Follow-up Comment #2, task #4355 (project avr-libc):
Yet do not change that. I shall to implement RTL prologues/epilogues in GCC
4.3. Then also it will be necessary to make changes to avr-libc, if it is
required.
Anatoly.
___
Reply to
As Eric Weddington wrote:
BTW, what version of doxygen is known to work?
I'm using 1.4.7.
I've still got a 1.4.6 here, but I don't think that's the issue.
--
cheers, Jorg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:53 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Eric Weddington
Subject: Re: [bug #17728] Errors building documentation in MinGW
As Eric Weddington wrote:
Good eye. I didn't catch
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #17728 (project avr-libc):
Deleted the make log, rebuilt from a clean checkout, and attached the new
make log.
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: avr-libc-make-log.tar.bz2 Size:102 KB
New make log
Previously:
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:50:42 +0100
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] multiple -Tdata options passed to the linker
for some AVRs
To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
