-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Ambroz Bizjak
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 8:34 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Faster integer
Hi John,
Since this will be on your local installation, there's really no right or wrong
way to do it. Like you said, if you toggle the *DEPRECATED_ENABLE identifier,
then it unpoisons everything else; you may not want to do that. If you remove
the poison from the header file, then you may
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 9:04 AM
To: avr-libc-com...@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-commit] [2386]
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 9:47 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [avr-libc
Hi Mike,
See inline below...
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org]
On Behalf Of Mike Rice
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:30 PM
To: avr-libc-com...@nongnu.org
I concur with Joerg on all items below.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 1:40 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Rice
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 12:22 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Time after time
w00t! :-)
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Rice
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 3:15 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Time
Hi Mike,
With avr-libc, where the functions are implementing some standard, we try to
adhere to that standard.
There are Standard C library functions. Users know this and don't create
functions that collide with the Standard C library. If someone includes
time.h (or avr/time.h, as the case
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Rolf Ebert
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:34 AM
To: Cynthia Rempel
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; Joel Sherrill
mention)? (You can send that to me privately if you need to.)
HTH,
Eric Weddington
-Original Message-
From: Cynthia Rempel [mailto:cynt6...@vandals.uidaho.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 10:43 AM
To: joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com; Weddington, Eric
Subject: Porting RTEMS patches to avr
Message-
From: Cynthia Rempel [mailto:cynt6...@vandals.uidaho.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2013 2:44 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
Subject: Porting RTEMS patches to avr-libc
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the fast response!
Now that I know simulAVR may be a desirable
Joerg, do you have any idea how much this function is actually used?
I might be open to doing some renaming, if the pain that it would cause
existing users is minimal.
I think it would be a good idea to support xmega users too.
Eric
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:39 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: mojo
Subject: Re:
#37901] CRC-CCITT calculation incorrect
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Can we create an alias macro? _crc_xmega_ccitt_update()? Then put
the explanation in the docs.
Why not just _crc_xmega_update()?
Sure. I don't really care about the specific name as long as it makes sense to
our users
#37901] CRC-CCITT calculation incorrect
On 12/11/2012 07:50 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
We need to support the xmega users better. If they're getting easily
confused, then we need to help.
It took me a while to discover that the Xmega CCITT wasn't the same as
the avr-libc function, and yes
#37901] CRC-CCITT calculation incorrect
On 12/11/2012 08:07 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Please send ideas for improvement. We're always open-minded, but just
sticklers for detail (as I'm sure you can tell).
One option might be to retain the current function solely as #defines,
but make
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:38 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Walthinsen [mailto:om...@omegacs.net]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
On 11/29/2012 02:55 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Well, go ahead and post the patches
-Original Message-
From: Erik Walthinsen [mailto:om...@omegacs.net]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 3:40 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
I thought I read a while back that since the headers are strictly
derived (by scripts
?
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
(XML)
That is dodgy; Atmel owns the copyright on those files. It's not
within your right to submit a work that you don't own the copyright
on.
Well, back in the era when Ted Roth did most of the work here, the
statement he got from Atmel was that using
] On
Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:05 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
On 11/16/2012 11:05 AM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Any help from those of you who are *not* regular contributors would be
very much appreciated. Ways
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Erik Walthinsen
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:52 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 9:59 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.8.1?
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:04 AM
To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr
Hi All,
It seems like it's been forever since we've had a discussion...
Do you think we have enough changes in the repo to warrant a 1.8.1 release? Or
should we get some bugs fixed and devices supported (yes, I know that last one
is a discussion) before such a release?
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
Hi Brendan,
Thanks for pointing this out. Admittedly, there are not a lot of people who
write their ISR in assembly. Most are able to write their ISRs in C.
Would you be willing to fill out a bug report on the avr-libc project? Emails
have a tendency to be forgotten about over time and we want
You're right. That's exactly what we need.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Dale [mailto:d...@4drealtime.co.za]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:05 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: brend...@computer.org; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Possible hole in the assembler
Hi Frédéric,
I think we'll need your help to get it in. I don't have the time at the moment
to look into it. :-/
Eric
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of
Hi Uwe,
Older devices, *may* not have the vector number defined. But I thought that our
intention was to make sure to add this information to all device header files.
Certainly, some of the older device header files may have been accidently
overlooked.
You can file a bug report at the
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Joerg
Wunsch
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 10:45 AM
To: AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] fflush()
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
Otte
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 1:55 PM
To: AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] fflush()
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Georg-
Johann Lay
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 4:19 PM
To: Daniel Otte
Cc: AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: David Brown [mailto:da...@westcontrol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:04 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: John Voltz; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [patch #7830] avr-libc headers are very outdated
On 14/08/2012 22:50, Weddington
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Dean
Camera
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:04 AM
To: Joerg Wunsch; Dean Camera; Jonathan Oakley;
-Original Message-
From: John Voltz [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:23 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; John Voltz; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [patch #7830] avr-libc headers are very outdated
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #7830 (project avr-libc
-Original Message-
From: John Voltz [mailto:john.vo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:38 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch #7830] avr-libc headers are very outdated
Eric,
I have also submitted a bug report to Atmel. I'm
-Original Message-
From: John Voltz [mailto:john.vo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:06 AM
To: David Brown
Cc: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [patch #7830] avr-libc headers are very outdated
Thanks David,
I just downloaded
] util/delay.h uses inline...
On 23/07/12 21:00, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I would hate to say, We have to use C99 for some avr-libc modules
(atomic.h), but we guarantee C89 compliance for other avr-libc
modules (delay.h). We really should be consistent across
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Joerg
Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:44 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug
] util/delay.h uses inline...
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
...instead of __inline or similar to make it work together with -std=c89
Sorry, but what's the bug here?
That our library code is supposed to be compatible to any -std= option
(except where documentation explains something else
] util/delay.h uses inline...
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Oh, so it needs to be __inline to comply with that?
Right.
The counter argument, though, is that C89 is already pretty old. Do we need to
comply with that standard? Or are we just going to comply with the C99 standard?
What
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Joerg
Wunsch
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 9:56 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #36921]
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of David
Brown
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 7:21 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Some question
Hi Dr. Klein,
Yes, this is the right place to ask those questions. However, avr-libc has had
on-again, off-again maintenance for its floating point library code, with
different maintainers over the years.
If you see a place where you are willing to help out, we would certainly
welcome the
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-
libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Omar
Choudary
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 10:30 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] including
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 6:32 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug
-Original Message-
From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:08 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: avr-gcc-l...@nongnu.org
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 4:25 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug
-Original Message-
From: Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 4:16 AM
To: Volker Kuhlmann; Joerg Wunsch; Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-
d...@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #34695] fixed width int types without __attribute__()
Follow-up Comment
Weddington
-Original Message-
From: David A. Mellis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 7:15 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #28837] using PSTR with c++ produces
warnings
Thanks for the message, Eric.
As you say, we
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Bob Paddock
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Jan Waclawek [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 8:30 AM
To: Jan Waclawek; Georg-Johann Lay; Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-
d...@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #33698] Explicit use of RJMP/RCALL can cause relocation
truncated to fit
-Original Message-
From: Jan Waclawek [mailto:konf...@efton.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:37 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; Bill Westfield; Jan Waclawek; Jan Waclawek; Georg-
Johann Lay; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #33716] pgmspace typedefs
Hi All,
We're working towards a 1.8.0 release. So for those of you on this list who are
not a regular developer on avr-libc, now would be a good time to get in any
last minute bug reports or patches.
Eric
___
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Jan Waclawek [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 12:48 PM
To: Jan Waclawek; Georg-Johann Lay; Bill Westfield; Weddington, Eric; avr-
libc-...@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #33716] pgmspace typedefs not legal
Follow-up Comment #3
-Original Message-
From: Bill Westfield [mailto:wes...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 3:41 PM
To: Jan Waclawek; Jan Waclawek; Georg-Johann Lay; Weddington, Eric; avr-
libc-...@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug #33716] pgmspace typedefs not legal
Rather than deprecating
-libc-commit] [2252] Add macro
avr_libc_revision_suffix, to provide a potential suffix that
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
The last time we talked about a release was to do 1.8.0, after we go
through the bug list.
Oops, you're right, I eventually forgot about that. ;-)
OK, so consider
Hi All,
What would it take to change avr-libc to build as a library-per-device?
Right now, it's library-per-architecture. I would like to add some new code,
but code that might really need to build per-device.
Any thoughts on what the migration path might be?
Eric
There is a limited test suite for avr-libc. Though I can't recall if there's
anything for pgmspace.h.
What non-AVR processor are you building a shim for?
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Bill Westfield
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 4:36 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch
Cc: AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re:
Have you tried again recently?
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Saydakov [mailto:sandy_sayda...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:07 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] UCSR1D register is not defined for
ATmega16U4/32U4
Action
Hi Alexander,
Could you please fill out a bug report at the avr-libc project here?:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=additemgroup=avr-libc
Because emails get lost in our inbox very quickly.
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 4:26 AM
To: Georg-Johann Lay; Bill Westfield; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for looking at this optimization.
I would be interested to know how the algorithm also compares on code size.
This is another important metric for avr-libc.
And could you please subscribe to the avr-libc mailing list? That way your
posts do not have to be approved. :-)
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Bradley Jarvis
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:46 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch; Bradley Jarvis; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: Bradley Jarvis [mailto:b...@pocketinnovations.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:51 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [patch #7464] Fix iom168p.h to be compatible
withiom168.h
Take a look
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 3:17 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [patch #7464]
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Markus Lampert
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 12:43 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] at90usbxx2.h
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Markus Lampert
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 1:21 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev]
missing CLKSEL0/1 and CLKSTA
registers
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Did you check the latest XML device files that come with AVR Studio?
I've got earlier XML files around, they contain these definitions,
yes.
Thanks for checking, Joerg
Hi All,
Any thoughts to the timing of a 1.7.2 release?
Thanks,
Eric
___
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 2:33 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Thoughts on
Hi Chris,
Mostly, yes.
Libgcc is absolutely needed as it contains certain math library routines and
other routines that gets used in the startup code. Libgcov is generally not
needed, and I'm not sure that it even works for the AVR.
Yes, the include files that GCC installs are useful. For
-Original Message-
From: Chris Marrin [mailto:ch...@marrin.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:21 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-gcc, libgcc.a and libgcov.a
Yes, it is very helpful. One other question is what is the purpose
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Per Arnold Blaasmo
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 2:29 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: FW: [avr-libc-dev] Patches
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 7:29 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Per Arnold Blaasmo; Boyapati,
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Ruud Vlaming
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 6:37 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Patches for
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 9:00 AM
To: Ruud Vlaming; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Anitha Boyapati
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 6:17 AM
To: Boyapati, Anitha; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject:
] power.h has additional endif
thatwillbreak the build system when power_all_disable() is used
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Anitha, there is a separate drop-down box for this information that
needs to be set, rather than putting a comment in the bug report.
... which I forgot to update
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 12:14 PM
To: Bill Perry; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 2:02 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [bug
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Stu Bell
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:49 PM
To: Alastair D'Silva; Stu Bell; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: John Myers [mailto:atomicdog@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 9:45 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Conditional poisoning of deprecated
items
I don't think the type of people
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of David A. Mellis
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 6:14 AM
To: John Myers
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; Weddington, Eric
-Original Message-
From: John Myers [mailto:atomicdog@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 7:17 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Conditional poisoning of deprecated
items
The system header pragma suppresses
-Original Message-
From: Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 7:52 PM
To: Boyapati, Anitha; Weddington, Eric; Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-
d...@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Feature wishlisht
The other point I would like to know is test strategy - how
Hi All,
We haven't had an RFC (Request For Comments) in a long time.
I've been going through a bunch of the I/O header files recently for one of the
bug reports/feature requests. I noticed, and also remembered, that we have an
awful lot of deprecated items, e.g. old ISR vector names.
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 11:08 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Feature
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:28 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE:
Thanks for the help, Joerg! :-)
Eric Weddington
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-commit-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:25 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Anitha Boyapati
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:43 PM
To: Boyapati, Anitha; Bill Perry; Joerg Wunsch;
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:55 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] 1.7.1
-Original Message-
From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:37 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: Boyapati, Anitha
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 10:16 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; 'Joerg Wunsch'; 'avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org'
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] 1.7.1 release-Next Week?
Clarification: We were discussing doing a 1.7.1 release ASAP, probably
within
-Original Message-
From: Daniele Basile [mailto:invalid.nore...@gnu.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 9:58 AM
To: Dmitry Xmelkov; joerg_wun...@uriah.heep.sax.de; Daniele Basile; Frank
Ennert; Joerg Wunsch; Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [patch #6951] Time
Hi Buddy,
Thanks for your interest! :-)
Yes, we could always use a bit of help here and there.
Are you familiar with using SVN (Subversion) and creating and using patches
using the 'diff' and 'patch' unix utilities?
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Praveen,
The XML files come with AVR Studio 5, not WinAVR.
The header file is supposed to match the XML file, not necessarily the
datasheet. If the header file does not match the XML file, then please file a
bug report at the avr-libc project.
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
-Original
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
