RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition

2009-03-13 Thread Ron Kreymborg
Good news... I finished(or so I think) the modification to the script. I have include two files. First is a XML generated by the first part of the script. It use the AVR Studio XML file to do so. Second file is the actual ioxxx.h to witch vector patch and pin definition patch have been

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition

2009-03-13 Thread Frédéric Nadeau
I don't want to push the discussion to an extreme, but looking around a few AVR's datasheet, I notice the following: In C code example, they often refer to defines that I'm currently working on such as: DDR_SCK DDR_XCKx etc. Where as I decided arbitrary to named them SCK_DDR XCKx_DDR etc. I do

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition

2009-03-13 Thread Frédéric Nadeau
I'm looking at the two USB definition that are missing iousbxx2.h and iousbxx6_7.h to add pin definition by hand. I'm stuck with the following dilemma: In data sheet for AT90USB646 as well as the one for AT90USB82, Clock pin for the SPI module is name in the pin description section as SCLK where

RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition

2009-03-13 Thread Weddington, Eric
-Original Message- From: avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.org [mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu. org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:55 AM To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #25846] include/avr/power.h:628:1: error: missing binary operator before token defined

2009-03-13 Thread Eric Weddington
Update of bug #25846 (project avr-libc): Status:None = Fixed Percent Complete: 0% = 100% Assigned to:None = arcanum Open/Closed:

[avr-libc-dev] [bug #25796] missing support for xmega128a1 ADDRMASK register

2009-03-13 Thread Eric Weddington
Update of bug #25796 (project avr-libc): Status:None = Fixed Percent Complete: 0% = 100% Assigned to:None = arcanum Open/Closed: