On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Weddington, Eric
eric.wedding...@atmel.com wrote:
I'm open to ideas on a naming scheme.
I'm working on the duplicate thing and I'm facing a
critical issue. It
has been decided that we should not care mutch if pins where active
low or active high(such as
*sigh*
I really wish the XML files were more consistent.
Many of us have that wish too.
In my view all of the individual XML files had to be unified
in to a single large XML file, and standardized in the process
of the conversion. Then an additional file merged in to add the
information
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #6805 (project avr-libc):
The patch for the GCC is not complete.
1. No numeric argument to the 'interrupt' attribute is implemented.
2. Not possible use one interrupt handler for some interrupt vectors.
I propose to implement the interface for interrupt handler
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:31 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re:
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:12 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re:
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #6805 (project avr-libc):
Good idea - a more complete implementation that mine (which was based on
Marek's original). I assume it will use the number for the vector and not the
handler_name (the C++ requirement).
Just curious - what is an example of (2)?
Ron
