-Original Message-
From: Shaun Jackman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:06 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude GUI with Fuse Calculator
On Nov 29, 2007 12:48 PM, Weddington, Eric
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:52 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] New release?
On Friday 30 November 2007 01:30, Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Taj Morton
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 3:08 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems with char */arrays
On Dec 10, 2007 8:08 AM, Joerg Wunsch
Hi All,
Fuse and Lockbit data in various IO header files has now been committed,
to 1.4 branch and to HEAD. This was the last bit of stuff that I wanted
to get in before a release.
Dmitry, do you still have stuff you want to commit?
Joerg, are you comfortable with doing a 1.6.0 release?
Any
:39, Weddington, Eric wrote:
[...]
Dmitry, do you still have stuff you want to commit?
Yes, I have made all commits which wished to make
before the stable release.
Thanks!
I've now also fixed a few header bugs. AFAIK, I'm now done with all the
bugs I'm going to fix for this release.
Eric W
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 4:09 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a
default behaviour?
Hi.
Now in case of unforeseen
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 3:58 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make abort() a normal function?
Hi.
Now the abort() is declared as
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:19 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a
default behaviour?
As Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:35 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a
default behaviour?
As Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 6:17 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-libc-commit] avr-libc
ChangeLoginclude/stdlib.h libc/stdlib...
As
...
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
... There's no point in trying to plug libgcc's faults
and omissions inside avr-libc.
Why not?
Because that bug is completely unimportant and purely cosmetical.
Real embedded applications don't exit() anyway. Mind you, we (at
least you and me) have been
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Shaun Jackman
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 12:00 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Wishlist: place static bool in GPIO registers
The General Purpose I/O
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 2:52 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] What about to make 'reti' as a
default behaviour?
As Weddington, Eric
...
On Thursday 20 December 2007 00:53, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Because that bug is completely unimportant and purely cosmetical.
Real embedded applications don't exit() anyway. Mind you, we (at
least you and me) have been shipping compiler/library combinations
where returning from main() didn't
...
On Thursday 20 December 2007 11:53, Weddington, Eric wrote:
[...]
But I definitely don't want to forget about this issue. I think that
this is an important enough change. Dmitry, would you be
willing to add
a Task to the Task Tracker on avr-libc for this?
This bug (#21841) is open at present
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Xmelkov
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 9:43 PM
To: Dmitry Xmelkov; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21862] File 'bench-libm.dox'
does not exist
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
I found this issue too, when trying to build 1.6.0. I also notified
Joerg of this. I'm sure it'll get fixed tomorrow.
I'll re-roll it as 1.6.1 then, and never announce 1.6.0. Now that the
1.6.0 label is already in the bug report, it makes no sense to try
sliding the tags
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ivan Shmakov
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 11:43 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] SPMEN, SELFPRGEN: name clash
There's apparently a
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ivan Shmakov
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 9:45 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: SPMEN, SELFPRGEN: name clash
WE == Weddington, Eric [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:13 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Dean Camera
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:00 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Rich Teer wrote:
There's another (I'd
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ivan Shmakov
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 9:36 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] SPMEN vs SELFPRGEN
Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:30 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
Weddington, Eric wrote:
. same license as avr
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ivan Shmakov
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Ivan Shmakov
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Re: SPMEN vs SELFPRGEN
BTW, is there any way to get
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:12 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
FYI, the libgcc library that ships with GCC,
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:42 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
Thanks
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:03 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: SPMEN vs SELFPRGEN
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
BTW, is there any
Hi All,
Problem: It seems that some of the new fuse definitions in various IO
header files conflicts with some bit definitions in the same file. This
is for avr-libc 1.6.x. There are 2 bug reports about this, and also
special thanks to Ivan Shmakov for finding out the rest of the name
conflicts
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 6:52 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Fixing fuse definitions
Hi All,
Problem: It seems that some
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Bourgeois
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:33 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library
Hi folks,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:12:37
Hi All,
In working on a new eeprom implementation, I found a couple of bugs. I
just committed a fix to the io90pwm2b.h and io90pwm3b.h IO header files
that adds a missing EEAR word-size register.
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
___
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
Hi All,
Because of an avr-libc bug (#21410), a GCC bug (#31644), and IIRC, the
fact that the EEPROM API does not work on at least 2 AVR devices, I have
taken a stab at rewriting the EEPROM API. The interface has been kept
the same, but instead of library functions, it has been rewritten as
macros
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:57 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
In general, I agree with you - static inline functions are
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hennebry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:24 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: David Brown; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Weddington, Eric wrote:
- One
Hi All,
We've had a task in the list to make avr-libc -mint8 compatible:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?3622
Is this still desired?
For my part, I would rather kill this task, and spend time on making GCC
optimal for the AVR target, even if it takes more time in the long run.
Thoughts?
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:34 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Weddington, Eric wrote:
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Rick Altherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:41 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: David Brown; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Or inline functions defined in a header file.
Sheesh. You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Ron Kreymborg
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:26 AM
To: 'Dean Camera'; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: C++ Interrupts
which was another line of thought for me.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:29 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: C++ Interrupts
As Dean Camera wrote:
My solution:
#define
-Original Message-
From: Wouter van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:00 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; 'Rick Altherr'
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Or inline functions defined in a header file
-Original Message-
From: Preston Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 7:58 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Attached is my latest source.
I did not receive any attached source in any of the email
-Original Message-
From: Tod E. Kurt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] AT90USB82 arch 'avr35' to gcc but
'avr5' to avr-libc
Everything's brand new, fresh off
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Ebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:13 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: required patches for avr-gcc 4.3.0
From the list of patches in winavr/patches/gcc/4.2.2/* the following
patches
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 5:09 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Question on IO header policy
I haven't looked at the xml files to see these
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 12:39 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Question on IO header policy
I just downloaded the latest datasheet, and
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:41 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Plans to update scanf().
Hi.
In the near future I am going to update vfscanf()
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:13 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] What about to update vfscanf() in 1_6 branch?
Hi.
After testing with all GCC
Hi Wouter and All,
I took your rewrite and had to fix a few things. I also added new 32-bit
integer read/write routines per Shaun's feature request (tracker on
avr-libc). Everything finally tested correctly.
I can finally say this now: Besides all of the other reasons I mentioned
for changing
Attachment problems. Trying again...
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 6:55 PM
To: Wouter van Gulik
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch; Shaun Jackman
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
From: Shaun Jackman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 7:45 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Wouter van Gulik; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Hi all,
I like the rewrite. It looks
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 4:04 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] New eeprom.h
Shaun Jackman wrote:
In the standard use of avr-libc with
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:51 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Avr-libc test results
On Saturday 15 March 2008 12:53, Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 6:30 AM
To: Dmitry K.; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] Avr-libc test results
Simulavr 0.1.2.3
Hi Joerg,
When you have a chance, could you take a look at all the various
outstanding delay stuff:
2 Feature requests:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?17216
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19178
And a Patch:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6418
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 4:59 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21410] Incorrect use of
16-bit eepromaddresses in devices with 8-Bit address
Hi All,
I'm doing a new release of WinAVR soon. A release candidate some time
this week, with a planned release on April 2. This release is mainly to
support the XMEGA devices, fix various bugs (avr-libc, WinAVR), and
support other new devices (ATmega32M1, ATmega32C1).
I've been going through
-Original Message-
From: Weddington, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 5:23 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Plan for new release: 1.6.2.
Hi All,
I'm doing a new release of WinAVR soon. A release candidate
some time this week, with a planned release on April 2
-Original Message-
From: CurtVM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Weddington, Eric; Dean Camera; CurtVM; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #22276] wdt_reset fails with devices with large
WDTCSR addresses
Follow-up Comment #4, bug
Hi All,
I now have all the new device support into avr-libc. I would like to do
a 1.6.2 release before April 2.
Thoughts, objections?
Eric
___
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 4:47 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.6.2 release?
On Thursday 27 March 2008 04:27, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Hi All
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:40 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] 1.6.2 release?
On Friday 28 March 2008 13:48, Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12:03 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] XMEGA: are SP, EEAR 16-bit registers?
Hi.
The common X-less AVR has a set of
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 4:25 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] eeprom_write_block() incompatibility
Hi.
I have accidentally revert the operands in
-Original Message-
From: Aurélien Francillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:53 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc installation error
Le Monday 07 April 2008 18:47:13 Weddington, Eric, vous avez
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:24 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hangin ATmega256x
Hm...
Is
Standard attachment error with Savannah's mailing lists.
Trying again.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Stu Bell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:40 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; Dmitry K.; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:46 PM
To: Stu Bell; Dmitry K.; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
eeprom_*_word/dword
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of ericwade
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:54 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc installation error
I actually used a combination of the regular
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:41 PM
To: Joerg Wunsch; Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [bug #23032] Define PORTxn, PINxn, DDxn bit names in
iomxx4.h.
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #23032
Hi All,
Small problem in XMEGA support: the macros in pgmspace.h are using a lot
of _SFR_IO_ADDR(RAMPZ) as operands. Obviously the RAMPZ address will
be incorrect because it is subtracting the 0x20 offset used for the rest
of the AVR devices. The XMEGA devices do not have such an offset.
Instead
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 3:42 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22540] Adding signature
bytes to header files
On Thursday 08 May 2008
, Weddington, Eric wrote:
I have just built it with Anatoly's patch to fix WinAVR bug
#1956569:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1956
569group_
id=68108atid=520074
I have not tested it yet. If you want to fix the problem with _SFR
macros, then now would
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Ebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 5:16 AM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: Weddington, Eric
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Problems with binutils patches
Hi Eric,
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
I have had some reports
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] New include sys/types?
I may have workaround for the test that is used
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Andy H
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 9:26 AM
To: Mike Stein; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Find problem with gcc patching libc
I was looking for
-Original Message-
From: Andy H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 10:21 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Mike Stein; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Find problem with gcc patching libc
We seem to be both using 4.4 head and same
-
From: Andy H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 10:35 AM
To: Weddington, Eric; Joerg Wunsch; Dmitry K.
Subject: Request for cbrt() and strdup to be added to libc
It seems gcc testsuite assumes presence of widely available
strdup() and
cbrt() functions.
strdup
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 2:09 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Request for cbrt() and strdup
to be added tolibc
As Andy H wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 2:35 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Request for cbrt() and strdup
to be addedtolibc
As Weddington, Eric wrote
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Hakan Ardo
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 2:50 AM
To: Preston Wilson
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] eeprom_write_block inconsistent
between WinAVR andLinux
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Hakan Ardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:24 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Preston Wilson; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] eeprom_write_block inconsistent
between WinAVR andLinux
OK, is there a tag
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Bernard Fouché
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 8:54 AM
To: Wouter van Gulik
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Definition of putchar/getchar
causes code growth
Hi.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Rich Teer
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 3:12 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Preferred non-windoze GUI debugger?
Hi all,
Hi Rich,
I've been using the AVR
Hi Rich,
The AVR32 GNU Toolchain uses Newlib.
You might want to ask on AVR Freaks, in the AVR32 Forum, where all the various
patches are to build the toolchain.
Eric Weddington
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Rich Teer
-Original Message-
From: Chris Troutner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:27 PM
To: Eric Weddington
Cc: Weddington, Eric; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug #24231] AVR Mistakes Value in Register
I'm using the latest, 1.6.2 of AVR Libc
Hi All,
FYI, I just added support for the upcoming new ATmega32U6 device.
Soon I will be adding support for a bunch of new XMEGA devices. The header
files for these have already been committed. These new devices are:
ATxmega64A3
ATxmega128A3
ATxmega256A3
ATxmega256A3B
Header files for the
Hi All,
If there is no overwhelming objection, I would like to call for a new release
of avr-libc: version 1.6.3.
I have on my todo list before a release:
- Bug #24634
- Finish adding support for the new xmega devices
And I will be going through the WinAVR bug reports for any easy, last-minute
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:31 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-libc build fails on freebsd
with latest doxygen
As Steve Franks wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 2:17 PM
To: Sebastien Lelong
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Open Source license for embedded systems
Why don't
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Sven Köhler
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:25 AM
To: Rick Altherr
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: headers only / bootstrapping
an avr toolchain
Turns
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Rolf Ebert
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:37 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices
Does anybody have patches that enable compiler
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 7:52 AM
To: Joerg Wunsch; avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices
As Weddington, Eric
:
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
atmega128a atmega168pa atmega16a atmega324pa atmega32a atmega32u6
atmega64a atmega88pa atmega8a attiny13a
Many of those devices you listed have not been formally released
yet, so support has not been added.
The question is whether we really want to do anything
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 12:39 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] compiler support of new devices
Eric Weddington wrote:
atmega128a
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Weddington, Eric
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:12 PM
To: Boris Borisov; AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib compiling error
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Boris Borisov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:35 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib compiling error
Hello All,
I try to update my avr-libc but compilation is fail with messages
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of Steve Franks
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 5:06 PM
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: [avr-libc-dev] does delay.h really need all this junk?
Y'all,
I was trying to figure out why
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Franks
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 11:22 AM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] does delay.h really need all this junk?
Right. Well, never
Hi Roy,
You'll have to use a custom linker file. Start with the standard linker file
(*.x) and modify it to add your section for the external eeprom. See the GNU ld
user manual (part of GNU Binutils) for more information on the linker file
format. In your .eeprom_ext section in the linker
Hi Anatoly,
Somehow, I don't see your attachment.
Eric
-Original Message-
From:
avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.org
[mailto:avr-libc-dev-bounces+eweddington=cso.atmel@nongnu.
org] On Behalf Of Anatoly Sokolov
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:31 PM
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
