> -----Original Message----- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:00 PM > To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] avr-lib-c-extentions library > > As Rich Teer wrote: > > > There's another (I'd argue, better) alternative: the CDDL. > > Certianly worth evaluating... > > Can you elaborate on "better"?
> . much more license text to worry about than the relatively simple > BSD license This one bothers me the most. From a first glance, the CDDL contains a lot of legalese. Almost need a lawyer to interpret. Constrast that with the BSD license which is simpler and more straightforward for non-lawyers to understand. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
