The name LAYER_OUTOFSPACE suggests that this is a real layer on which windows
can be put, but it's only used as an integer which describes the maximum
allowed / used layer.
Therefor, renaming it to LAYER_MAX and adding a comment which describes this
might make sense.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter
At 1239353043 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
The name LAYER_OUTOFSPACE suggests that this is a real layer on which windows
can be put, but it's only used as an integer which describes the maximum
allowed / used layer.
Therefor, renaming it to LAYER_MAX and adding a comment which describes this
How about MAX_LAYER? Or MAX_LAYER_INDEX?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:47:25AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1239353043 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
The name LAYER_OUTOFSPACE suggests that this is a real layer on which
windows
can be put, but it's only used as an integer which describes
At 1239354691 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
Uhm... LAYER_COUNT? NUM_LAYERS? Something like that...?
LAYER_COUNT seems fine. :)
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// And thinking so much differently.