THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#329 - too hard to un-snap windows from edges
User who did this - Dale P. Smith (dsmith)
--
Heh. I've done exactly that. It doesn't solve the problem however.
On a related note, I'd like to adju
Le Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:31:36 +0200,
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> The important part was "attached".
> (not inlined :)
>
Ah yeah, like this ^_^
>From a3dd5432f9f516e03ed85e2ee179de1878ec26f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gwenhael Le Moine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#329 - too hard to un-snap windows from edges
User who did this - Paul Bonser (pib)
--
You could try different values of "snap" passed to mouse_move in your rc.lua.
According to the docs it defaul
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#329 - too hard to un-snap windows from edges
User who did this - Dale P. Smith (dsmith)
--
This is *very* annoying.
To get the accel up enough to start moving the window, you move the mouse
fair
At 1223904164 time_t, Gwenhael Le Moine wrote:
> > Okay, it seems in fact not consistent but more user friendly, I agree.
> > Could you resend your patch as attached?
> >
> > It seems that your MUA screwed it up by splitting lines.
The important part was "attached".
(not inlined :)
--
Julien Da
At 1223918862 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
> How would you setup a timer hook to be executed only once? I could need that
> for Space Invaders :)
Call unregister() ?
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signat
> - It'd be nice to register a timer function for each notification.
> That'd allow to call it only once after X seconds and not call it
> every seconds, which is useless, time consuming and wakes awesome for
> nothing.
How would you setup a timer hook to be executed only once? I could need
Le Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:37:56 +0200,
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Okay, it seems in fact not consistent but more user friendly, I agree.
> Could you resend your patch as attached?
>
> It seems that your MUA screwed it up by splitting lines.
From a3dd5432f9f516e03ed85e2ee179de1878
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task is now closed:
FS#332 - run prompt should only appear on one head
User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd)
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: commit
68ac8e1c659666e49045dad60d07db4951a7bbd2
Author: Jul
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task is now closed:
FS#341 - wine windows loose keyboard focus
User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd)
Reason for closing: Fixed
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&tas
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task is now closed:
FS#338 - awesome freezes via awesome-client and piping into it
User who did this - Julien Danjou (jd)
Reason for closing: Fixed
Additional comments about closing: commit
bc5569ab94a0c82d316686212e5f984ea945f637
Autho
At 1223862791 time_t, koniu wrote:
> Now, I have basic functionality implemented but there's a couple of
> things I'm struggling to get around:
> 1. Currently notifications have fixed height/width. Is there a way to
> get some sort of auto-sizing for floating wiboxes?
Nop.
> 2. Clicking notificat
At 1223826414 time_t, Gwenhael Le Moine wrote:
> I like it better like this :) I prefer fairv but I like my 2 uxterm to
> take all screen's height when they're just the 2 of them.
Okay, it seems in fact not consistent but more user friendly, I agree.
Could you resend your patch as attached?
It se
13 matches
Mail list logo