Re: Invalid _NET_WM_ICONs not properly caught

2009-05-19 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1242673617 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: Both patches are attached again. Thanks, pushed. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // And thinking so much differently. signature.asc Description:

[Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

2009-05-19 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Julien Danjou wrote: At 1239465244 time_t, Gregor Best wrote: Hmm, the thing is, here it works fine with first opacity, then screen, and to be honest, I don't really see why it shouldn't work. Opacity is a WM hint just like the class, name,

Re: [Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

2009-05-19 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1242731066 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: I marked this mail as hey Uli, this sounds like a neat idea, why don't you implement this when you have the time. Find the patch attached. Since you seems to have time :-) I'd have another suggestion for the implementation for this patch. That should

Re: Pager problem with ban offscreen

2009-05-19 Thread Maarten Maathuis
I don't know, i've looked around and all i've seen so far is either unmap(most) or moving (dwm) or a choice between unmapping and moving (ion3). An alternative is looking at gnome-panel and see what it checks for, but the sourcecode is not very transparent. Maarten. -- To unsubscribe, send

Re: [Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

2009-05-19 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Julien Danjou wrote: At 1242731066 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: I marked this mail as hey Uli, this sounds like a neat idea, why don't you implement this when you have the time. Find the patch attached. Since you seems to have time :-) I'd

Re: awesome upgrade causes blank screen

2009-05-19 Thread Andrei Thorp
Since you just upgraded your system, are you aware that in new versions of X.org you have to explicitly enable the Ctrl-Alt-Backspace combination (DontZap in xorg.conf)? Also, when you find your system or X stuck and Ctrl-Alt-Fx does not work, you can put your keyboard in raw mode and then

Re: awesome upgrade causes blank screen

2009-05-19 Thread dante4d
Honestly, I knew there's a way to do this (SysRq thing...) but I was very lazy to set it up. But I will probably think about it some more :). Still, I say it's weird how it crashed. If I manage to shovel away some of my work, I will try to examine what exacly happened there when it froze... On

Re: Thanks, Uli!

2009-05-19 Thread Uli Schlachter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Andrei Thorp wrote: I've just noticed that Uli writes tonnes of little finicky patches for internals that people don't think about and optimization. He also catches/fixes a lot of subtle bugs this way. I find that it's very uncommon for someone