-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I'm currently trying to make my config work with current master. One thing I
found: awful.widget.graph and .progressbar don't offer the same features their C
counterparts had. I'll see if I write some patches on this...
The first patch makes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Uli Schlachter wrote:
The first patch makes awful.wibox() work with non-north orientation and
user-specified geometries.
I'm just a human Attached is a New and Improved (tm) version of this first
patch.
Cheers,
Uli
- --
Do you know that
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Let's see which other patches I will come up with... (Anyone wants to
enhance
awful.widget.*? vertical progressbars and graphs with more than one graph
sound
like a goal (I use one graph which shows used mem and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244286306 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
I'm currently trying to make my config work with current master. One thing I
found: awful.widget.graph and .progressbar don't offer the same features
their C
counterparts had.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
calmar c. wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Let's see which other patches I will come up with... (Anyone wants to
enhance
awful.widget.*? vertical progressbars and graphs with more than one graph
sound
At 1244300756 time_t, Marco Candrian wrote:
the graph has more than one thing. You can use a line style to
have one over all others.
You would be able to do the same with the widget layouts, AFAIU.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42
At 1244305993 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
@Julien: Apropos, any reason why we can't have 'scale = true'? Would you mind
a
patch which adds this back, too? And if we have auto-scaling, adding back
max_value (currently it requires values between 0 and 1) wouldn't be much work
either
I
At 1244303844 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
And if I want this now and not in 6 months?
You help Gregor? Or stay with 3.3 or the old widget for the time being.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
//
At 1244306622 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote:
You help Gregor? Or stay with 3.3 or the old widget for the time being.
FWIW, I don't think like I need to justificate what I did, but removing
the progressbar and graph from the C side will drop around 1K SLOC,
which is just around 8 % of core size. A
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Uli Schlachter wrote:
[...]
[fg_center] = beautiful.gr_cpu_nice_center,
[fg_end] = beautiful.gr_cpu_nice_end,
[vertical_gradient] = true,
[scale] = false,
[max_value] = 100.0,
[style] = line
})
This doesn't work in master
Any updates on rejection / integration?
--
GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a--- C++ UL+++ US UB++ P+++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ o--
K- w--- O M-- V PS+ PE- Y+ PGP+++ t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b++ DI+++ D+++ G+
e- h! r y+
Gregor Best
pgpUX5eOU8t6l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 07:50:08PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244307769 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
I think Uli means not stacking two graphs on top of each other, which is
certainly possible with widget layouts, but he means superimposing two
graphs so that they are both drawn in the
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 07:59:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244310858 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
Only if imageboxes and their drawing code support transparency :) Else
the last-drawn graph would completely occlude the first-drawn which
would make the first-drawn invisible
It does,
At 1244224475 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
Pushed, thanks Gregor.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// This is the end of my signature.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
At 1244286306 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
If a wibox with non-north geometry was created and a wibox size was specified,
this function happily ignored it when it made the wibox fit.
The hunk in wibox.c partly reverts 7cc0b13eae2638aaab40bfd1632036a6bea4d8d4.
No idea if this is a good idea
At 1244292328 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
I'm just a human Attached is a New and Improved (tm) version of this first
patch.
Me too, ignore my previous mail.
---
lib/awful/wibox.lua.in | 11 +--
wibox.c|4 ++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4
At 1244311597 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
Maybe I should write awful.widget.layout.sameplace then which draws all
its widgets onto the same space. I'd be grateful for test cases, because
my experience with graph and progressbar widgets is nearly nil
Hum, IIRC 'sameplace' algo was the default is
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 08:35:19PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244311597 time_t, Gregor Best wrote:
Maybe I should write awful.widget.layout.sameplace then which draws all
its widgets onto the same space. I'd be grateful for test cases, because
my experience with graph and progressbar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244292328 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote:
I'm just a human Attached is a New and Improved (tm) version of this
first
patch.
Me too, ignore my previous mail.
---
lib/awful/wibox.lua.in | 11 +--
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 08:08:28PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
No, it's about code maintainability. 200 SLOC of Lua beats - by large -
more than 1 K SLOC of C. :-)
then again, the C code seemed to have worked nicely. It's also a
seperate file etc. - nothing to care for all the time?
I actually
At 1244317804 time_t, Marco Candrian wrote:
then again, the C code seemed to have worked nicely. It's also a
seperate file etc. - nothing to care for all the time?
Not really. That's evolution: adapt or die. And that's how every part of
awesome's code works. I'm sorry that people feel sad when
At 1244321281 time_t, Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
Is there a roadmap wiki or something? I'd be nice to know which are the
3-4 most relevant things which are being worked on for 3.4?
Not really, I keep my TODO private for no reasons. I used to use FS, but
I'm not that comfortable with it
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 10:45:54PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
At 1244317804 time_t, Marco Candrian wrote:
then again, the C code seemed to have worked nicely. It's also a
seperate file etc. - nothing to care for all the time?
awesome's code works. I'm sorry that people feel sad when their
23 matches
Mail list logo
