[Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Julien Danjou wrote: At 1239465244 time_t, Gregor Best wrote: Hmm, the thing is, here it works fine with first opacity, then screen, and to be honest, I don't really see why it shouldn't work. Opacity is a WM hint just like the class, name,

Re: [Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

At 1242731066 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: I marked this mail as hey Uli, this sounds like a neat idea, why don't you implement this when you have the time. Find the patch attached. Since you seems to have time :-) I'd have another suggestion for the implementation for this patch. That should

Re: [Patch] Allow setting wibox.opacity if wibox.screen is nil (was: Re: [PATCH] naughty: set screen first and opacity afterwards)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Julien Danjou wrote: At 1242731066 time_t, Uli Schlachter wrote: I marked this mail as hey Uli, this sounds like a neat idea, why don't you implement this when you have the time. Find the patch attached. Since you seems to have time :-) I'd