Adrian C. an...@sysphere.org writes:
Pushed. :-)
Thanks a lot for this very nice work, Adrian.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ jul...@danjou.info http://julien.danjou.info
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-devel-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Gwenhael Le Moine wrote:
- Calling set_ticks(true) enables ticks for a progressbar
and the casual suicidal lurker that I am instantly copied this to one
of my progressbar, which not-so-nicely crashed awesome instantly as
well...
I forgot to CC the second version to
I think the ticks look _very_ nice -- especially with the gradients.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Adrian C. an...@sysphere.org wrote:
Hello,
sticking to the same principles from my last e-mail, the simple is
better than complex and so on, here is the second version of ticks.
My biggest
+1 from me for the patch :)
--
GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a-- C++ UL+++ US UB++ P+++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ o--
K- w--- ?O M-- ?V PS++ PE- Y++ PGP+++ t+ 5 X+ R tv b+++ DI+++
D+++ G+ e h! r y+
Gregor Best
pgpQVs5pcxdsW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Andrei Thorp wrote:
I think the ticks look _very_ nice -- especially with the gradients.
That's great, I also like ticks :) and these do look nice if a user sets
on to make them look nice.
That right there is my biggest problem. I got the ball rolling, but am I
not sure
Hi,
I also like ticks, ++ from me too :)
And I'm still of the opinion to let the user tune the params. No
algorithm would be perfect and a lot of users would end up setting their
own values anyway, IMHO.
Thanks!
lukash
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:11:24 +0100 (CET) Adrian C. an...@sysphere.org
Hello,
sticking to the same principles from my last e-mail, the simple is
better than complex and so on, here is the second version of ticks.
My biggest dilemma in the last e-mail was ticks and gaps sizes.
Considering possible implementations I settled on the following; being
that the
