> On 17 May 2018, at 20:04, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2018 11:35, Dmitry Markov wrote:
>> So if I got you right, it is not necessary to call these methods if the
>> target has been resized. In other words we should NOT change the if-statement
>> FROM:
>>
On 17/05/2018 11:35, Dmitry Markov wrote:
So if I got you right, it is not necessary to call these methods if the
target has been resized. In other words we should NOT change the
if-statement
FROM:
if (pResized || isNewDevice)
TO:
if (pResized || *tResized *|| isNewDevice)
Is my understanding
> On 17 May 2018, at 19:25, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2018 02:05, Dmitry Markov wrote:
>> Hi Sergey,
>> According to your fix replacSurfaceData() and updateMinimumSize() are
>> invoked only if the graphics device has been changed or the peer has been
>>
On 17/05/2018 02:05, Dmitry Markov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
According to your fix replacSurfaceData() and updateMinimumSize() are invoked
only if the graphics device has been changed or the peer has been resized:
734 if (pResized || isNewDevice) {
735 replaceSurfaceData();
Hi Sergey,
According to your fix replacSurfaceData() and updateMinimumSize() are invoked
only if the graphics device has been changed or the peer has been resized:
> 734 if (pResized || isNewDevice) {
> 735 replaceSurfaceData();
> 736 updateMinimumSize();
>
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk11.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201364
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8201364/webrev.00
Description:
The bug occurs when the application tries to set location of the window
to the point, where the window cannot be placed. For