On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Dennis Sosnoski d...@sosnoski.com wrote:
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi Dennis:
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Whether officially led by WSO2 or not, certainly most of the direction
of the project has come from people associated with WSO2 and/or the Sri
Lanka
Dennis, ALL of the original people who worked on Axis2 from LSF/WSO2 are now
in different places - most of them are in grad schools. One of the really
great things that Axis2 has managed to do is attract a fairly broad
community of people - IBM has contributed a lot even though they're quiet
now.
Hi Dennis,
First of all, it is not true that Axis2 work is lead by WSO2 any more ..
that changed a long time ago. We're continuing to contribute but we're not
the only contributors. IBM was contributing too but they seem to have take
things in-house (again) but I may be wrong (hopefully someone
Dennis,
Since my current employer's name came up...
* We rigorously track latest changes in Axiom/Axis2/ws-commons/xml-schema/woden etc. Andreas is particularly very
productive :)
* Any changes we have to these projects, we track those as well and make sure they get back into Apache SVN. But
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:55, Davanum Srinivasdava...@gmail.com wrote:
Dennis,
Since my current employer's name came up...
* We rigorously track latest changes in
Axiom/Axis2/ws-commons/xml-schema/woden etc. Andreas is particularly very
productive :)
HELP!!! Big Blue has a file about me
-N1008F
So the answer is no. Of course there are areas we can improve on, but
Axis2 is certainly not dying.
Azeez
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Dennis Sosnoskid...@sosnoski.com wrote:
I'm starting to wonder about the health of the Axis2 project, and thought it
might be useful to initiate
Andreas,
LOL!, Can you please point them to me?
Each committer does his/her own thing...i was just pointing out what is being
done as a whole team :)
thanks,
dims
On 07/23/2009 07:15 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:55, Davanum Srinivasdava...@gmail.com wrote:
Dennis,
Hi Sanjiva,
Whether officially led by WSO2 or not, certainly most of the direction
of the project has come from people associated with WSO2 and/or the Sri
Lanka university. Glen is, I believe, the current chair of the PMC, and
was also the release manager for the 1.5 release.
As to Axis2
Hi Dennis:
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Whether officially led by WSO2 or not, certainly most of the direction
of the project has come from people associated with WSO2 and/or the Sri
Lanka university. Glen is, I believe, the current chair of the PMC, and
was also the release manager for the 1.5
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi Dennis:
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Whether officially led by WSO2 or not, certainly most of the direction
of the project has come from people associated with WSO2 and/or the Sri
Lanka university...
I agree re: most of the committership having historically been from
Hi Dennis:
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
I'm going to try and get 1.5.1 out the door ASAP, and will commit to
at least
the transports happening along with that.
Sounds great, Glen! But Axis2 really requires compatible Rampart and
probably Sandesha releases since these implement functionally which
Dennis,
fyi, I've been with IBM since Jan 2008.
thanks,
dims
On 07/23/2009 12:49 PM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Glen Daniels wrote:
Hi Dennis:
Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
Whether officially led by WSO2 or not, certainly most of the direction
of the project has come from people associated with WSO2
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 13:18, Davanum Srinivasdava...@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas,
LOL!, Can you please point them to me?
Sure, the comments were related to the change in r785712, the change
in r785716 and to WSCOMMONS-477.
Thanks,
Andreas
Each committer does his/her own thing...i was just
Glen Daniels wrote:
...
IMO, this would be a bad idea. The goal of the kind of modularity we have,
or at least one of the goals, is to enable the components to version and
release at different rates. Unless there were incompatible API changes
(which certainly do happen) we should be able to
I'm starting to wonder about the health of the Axis2 project, and
thought it might be useful to initiate a discussion on this topic.
The 1.5 release of Axis2 took 8 months from initial proposal to when it
finally escaped out the door, and the results frankly don't seem to
reflect the amount
15 matches
Mail list logo