RE: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Parikh,Pratik
porting it to java 5. Thanks, Parikh, Pratik | Software Engineer | Cerner Corporation | (1)-816-201-1298 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.cerner.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:18 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Davanum Srinivas
: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 2:18 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: GCJ I don't know ... I tryed to run a test client I developed using eclipse with axis (pretty easy). It worked over Sun's stuf but when it came to compile it with GCJ I started to find problems regarding

RE: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Parikh,Pratik
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:44 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GCJ Pratik, Thanks for your feedback. Have u tried it? Do you have any experience with it? We are in touch with Kaffe/Classpath/gcj/gcjx folks but we have not tried Axis2

RE: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Parikh,Pratik
Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 10:10 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GCJ jesse, good news for you. pick up the activation jars and even mailapi jars from Geronimo. (http://ibiblio.org/maven/geronimo-spec

Re: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Davanum Srinivas
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GCJ jesse, good news for you. pick up the activation jars and even mailapi jars from Geronimo. (http://ibiblio.org/maven/geronimo-spec/jars/). then u can have a 100% free stack. -- dims On 1/11/06, Jesse Sightler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I think it would

RE: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Parikh,Pratik
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GCJ Nope. we are just talking about running whatever code we have with an alternative jvm. dev team strongly feels (when last polled) that if people want to use jdk1.3 then use Axis1, if they want to use 1.4 or 1.5 then use Axis2. Note that as long as the dev team feels

Re: GCJ

2006-01-11 Thread Jesse Sightler
Cool! I didn't know they had reimplemented those for Geronimo... I'll have to check it out sometime.Thanks,JessOn 1/11/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:jesse, good news for you. pick up the activation jars and even mailapi jarsfrom Geronimo.

RE: GCJ

2006-01-10 Thread Parikh,Pratik
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:59 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: GCJ Not yet. Can you please help us do it? thanks, dims On 1/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! Are there any initiatives to port axis to gcjlib? Did someone

Re: GCJ

2006-01-10 Thread Jesse Sightler
I don't know about GCJ and the server functionality specifically, but the client code works nicely with GNU Classpath 0.19 (tested under IKVM). I would suspect that most of Axis would work nicely as well.I wouldn't recommend it without some fairly thorough testing, but the technology there is