xception and deals with the new bindings.
> 2. only generates the SEI and types.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/01/2002 03:50:06 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To:<[EMAI
ndings.
> 2. only generates the SEI and types.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/01/2002 03:50:06 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject
ease respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Russell
I don't believe these extra enhancements to be just valid for WSIF.
The JAX-RPC spec allows the usage of dynamic proxies, where there is no
stub
class. This
with the new bindings.
> 2. only generates the SEI and types.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/01/2002 03:50:06 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
AIL PROTECTED]
To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Russell
I don't believe these extra enhancements to be just valid for WSIF.
The JAX-RPC spec allows the usage of dynamic proxies, where there is no
stub
class. This is the model we
sell Butek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
>
>
>
>
> I don't like lots of extra options on WSDL2Java just for WSIF
(particularly
> if you'll always use
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
> Anthony,
>
> I would think that a different approach would be much better:
Elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/30/2002 09:53:29 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Absolutely, fixing WSDL2Java so it doesn't abend is probably what I really
meant but just described badly. Igno
CTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Seems to me that we need a new extension - WSDL2WSIF. This could either
extend WSDL2Java or extend the base framework WSDL2.
If I could get some more information from you folks about what you actual
apped for time).
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/30/2002 08:46:20 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
Anthony,
I
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [axis] WSDL2Java enhancements for WSIF
In WSIF we use the AXIS WSDL2Java tool to generate the interfaces and
complex type classes that WSIF requires.
Currently WSDL2Java will always also generate the
In WSIF we use the AXIS WSDL2Java tool to generate the interfaces and
complex type classes that WSIF requires.
Currently WSDL2Java will always also generate the stub classes that WSIF
does not require, and also when using WSDL that includes some of the WSIF
specific bindings WSDL2Java will abend.
12 matches
Mail list logo