RE: Clash Testcase Changes

2002-05-22 Thread Russell Butek
:RE: Clash Testcase Changes The change (error recognition) is being incorporated into WSDL4J (according to one of the WSDL4J developers)... That's how the error was found originally. Regards...Greg Glen Daniels <[EMAIL P

RE: Clash Testcase Changes

2002-05-22 Thread R J Scheuerle Jr
'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Subject:        RE: Clash Testcase Changes           So in other words we dealt with even more ambiguity than is allowed by WSDL?  Cool!  Should we (or WSDL4J?) be checking for this when parsing the WSDL?   --G -Original Message- F

RE: Clash Testcase Changes

2002-05-22 Thread Greg Truty
cc: 05/22/2002 10:59 Subject: RE: Clash Testcase Changes AM Ple

RE: Clash Testcase Changes

2002-05-22 Thread Glen Daniels
  So in other words we dealt with even more ambiguity than is allowed by WSDL?  Cool!  Should we (or WSDL4J?) be checking for this when parsing the WSDL?   --G -Original Message-From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:22 AMTo: [EMAIL