-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/07/2002
> 08:26:31 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: Errors creating java files through "Wsdl2java"
>
&
>Interesting idea. If I read the WSDL spec correctly, the soap:address is
>not absolutely required for legal WSDL.
That's my understanding - isn't one of the big features of WSDL the
separation of address from service description?
>I don't think we can get away with your idea, though, because i
S,NANCY (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/07/2002
08:26:31 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Errors creating java files through "Wsdl2java"
Has there been any tho
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Errors creating java files through "Wsdl2java"
>
>
> I suspect you did not specify the --location option. That option is
> required. Otherwise WSDL is generated that doesn't have a
> location in the
> service clause and WSDL2Java
I suspect you did not specify the --location option. That option is
required. Otherwise WSDL is generated that doesn't have a location in the
service clause and WSDL2Java fails for the reason given.
We've fixed Java2WSDL since alpha3 so that it doesn't run without a
location.
Russell Butek
[EM
