Sam,
I did not want to eliminate the unit testcase since i thought rsitze might want to add
something
else there. I just commented it out so that Gump (and my all-tests) would not fail.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the
Ouch. Caught me.
***
Richard A. Sitze[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CORBA Interoperability & WebServices
IBM WebSphere Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/13/2002 12:19 PM
Please respond to axis-dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the unit test case
entirely?
>dims2002/06/13 10:19:43
>
> Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
> Log:
> comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-)
>
> Revision ChangesPath
>
