stevel 2002/11/18 15:36:57
Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Log:
turn on a test that only gets called in online mode
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +9 -7 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java
Index: TestXMLUtils.java
===
dims2002/10/30 14:56:19
Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java
java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding
DeserializationContextImpl.java
java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Added: java/src/org/apache/axis/utils Defaul
dims2002/06/18 11:01:25
Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils DOM2Writer.java
java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Log:
- Fix for Bug 9963 - DOM2Writer doesn't treat the "xml" namspace specially
- Added a test case too.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9
rsitze 2002/06/13 12:44:24
Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Log:
Remove unnecessary test.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +0 -6 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java
Index: TestXMLUtils.java
=
Sam,
I did not want to eliminate the unit testcase since i thought rsitze might want to add
something
else there. I just commented it out so that Gump (and my all-tests) would not fail.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the
cc:
Subject: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
dims 2002/06/13 10:19:43
Modified: java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Log:
comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-)
Revision Changes Path
This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the unit test case
entirely?
>dims2002/06/13 10:19:43
>
> Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
> Log:
> comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-)
>
> Revision ChangesPath
>
dims2002/06/13 10:19:43
Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java
Log:
comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +2 -2 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java
Index: TestXMLUtils.
