+1 for #2 --all refers to elements in the immediate WSDL file but not in
imported
Sylvain.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: emitAll option in WSDL2Java
Questions about a
Glen wrote:
>
> > What is the relationship between --all and --noImports? We can say a
> > couple things:
> > 1. --all supercedes --noImports
> > 2. --all refers to elements in the immediate WSDL file but
> > not in imported
> > files.
> > I think I prefer #2.
>
> I think --all simply means "do
cc:
Subject: RE: emitAll option in
WSDL2Java
02/06/200
: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: emitAll option in WSDL2Java
Questions about a --all flag:
Do we call it --all or --emitAll? I prefer --all for brevity. Neither "a"
nor "e" have been used in t
> Do we call it --all or --emitAll? I prefer --all for
> brevity. Neither "a"
> nor "e" have been used in the shorthand version of any other
> option, so we
> have no restrictions there.
+1 for --all
> What is the relationship between --all and --noImports? We can say a
> couple things:
> 1
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: emitAll option in WSDL2Java
Hi,
We've been using Axis for our client proxy generation for the last two
weeks
and have been very pleased with the results.
I noticed i
Hi,
We've been using Axis for our client proxy generation for the last two weeks
and have been very pleased with the results.
I noticed in a previous thread on this list that there was discussion about
adding an emitAll option to WSDL2Java which would generate all of the
classes (complex types,
