Re: WSDL for attachments and WSDL2Java

2008-09-03 Thread Ian Ashley
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:15:56 +0530 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WSDL for attachments and WSDL2Java Hi, I guess the problem is caused by the following messages in your WSDL, wsdl:message name=GetAssetSoapOut wsdl:part name=parameters element=tns:GetAssetResponse

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-26 Thread Thilina Gunarathne
Gunarathne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:17 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org; Jeremy HynoskiSubject: Re: WSDL with attachments Last week Axis2 MTOM WSE3.0 July CTP succesfully interop for a simple sample. There were few issues in earlier CTP's with respect to MIME handling

RE: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-26 Thread Tony Dean
Do we have any hardened dates for Axis2 final production release to be available? -Original Message- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 9:39 PM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: WSDL with attachments MTOM. Preliminary support

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread csj
Naresh From my understanding of WSDL there is no standard way to describe services that accept MIME/DIME attachments. The best way is to add a comment at the top of the WSDL stating which methods accept attachments in what encapsulation format. Regards On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Agarwal, Naresh

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread csj
Anne This method works, but it has its limitations. A few months back I had implemented this and found while trying to build mime multipart related messages I frequently got out of memory errors unless I bumped up the JVM, although this worked great for smaller attachments, increasing the JVM's

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
My recommendation: don't send attachments. If that's not an option, then I suggest you file an enhancement request to improve the efficiency of attachments processing, although I suspect the dev team won't be too keen on spending the time on this request. Axis2 uses MTOM, and I expect it to be

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Ben Szekely
Hi Anne, I posted a message earlier, having had problems with MIME attachments myself. What is the current state-of-the-art alternative to sending attachments that the axis team intends to support? - Ben Anne Thomas Manes wrote: My recommendation: don't send attachments. If that's

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
MTOM. Preliminary support is already available in Axis2. On 7/25/05, Ben Szekely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Anne, I posted a message earlier, having had problems with MIME attachments myself. What is the current state-of-the-art alternative to sending attachments that the axis team

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Jeremy Hynoski
On 7/25/05, Anne Thomas Manes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MTOM. Preliminary support is already available in Axis2. MTOM still scares me a lot, especially with respect to interop. Microsoft ended up supporting a version of DIME slightly different to the spec, then unceremoniously dumped it in favor

Re: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Thilina Gunarathne
Last week Axis2 MTOM WSE3.0 July CTP succesfully interop for a simple sample. There were few issues in earlier CTP's with respect to MIME handling, which they have corrected in the July CTP. ~Thilina

RE: WSDL with attachments

2005-07-25 Thread Agarwal, Naresh
, MTOM will be the standard for attachment. Will MTOM replace MIME and DIME in SOAP 1.2? thanks, Naresh From: Thilina Gunarathne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:17 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org; Jeremy HynoskiSubject: Re: WSDL with attachments Last week Axis2 MTOM