That only makes sense, 'wrapped' is more of an Axis thing.
Jai
-Original Message-
From: jay limfueco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Serialization Compatibility
hmmm that's weird I seem to be havi
hmmm that's weird I seem to be having a problem in .Net
interoperability when using 'wrapped/literal' but works fine on
'document/literal' and 'RPC/encoded'
some XML Validation errors when parsing the apache generated WSDL.
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:56:30 +0100, WAJSBERG Julien RD-BIZZ
<[EMAI
Hi,
I found once that interoperability for HashMap of Strings is good
between axis 1.1 and Perl, using RPC/Encoded.
using literal encoding, it doesn't work anymore.
The problem is that you will need wrapped/literal mode for
interoperability with .Net :)
So, Anne is right, you should avoid HashM
Bad idea. Always avoid collections. Use an array instead.
-Original Message-
From: jay limfueco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serialization Compatibility
Hi,
I'm currently working on a web service that should su
Bad idea. Always avoid collections. Use an array instead.
-Original Message-
From: jay limfueco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serialization Compatibility
Hi,
I'm currently working on a web service that should su
Hi,
I'm currently working on a web service that should support PHP, Pearl
and .Net clients and I was wondering if a serialized HashMap is
supported by those other languages.
Thanks
