Sorry for the lag... busy-busy...
Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK, well Berin's asking about progress on the PMC list. Would you like
to respond or would you prefer I did?
Either way is fine with me. I don't mind doing it, but it'll have to
wait till Mon. or Tues.
-kip
On 28 Apr 2004, at 17:00, Kip Hampton wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I was just afraid that we could have problems eating the whole
sandwich if it just looks like too much to take on.
Sure, understood. I just truly believe that this is one of those cases
where we'd do better to just dive in and take
Matt Sergeant wrote:
I was just afraid that we could have problems eating the whole sandwich
if it just looks like too much to take on.
Sure, understood. I just truly believe that this is one of those cases
where we'd do better to just dive in and take things as they come.
-kip
On 27 Apr 2004, at 19:23, Kip Hampton wrote:
Matt Sergeant wrote:
My suggestion is that to move forwards with things we hold off on the
TLP
thing for now - lets get the other parts of Kip's proposal working
first.
Lets try and eat this sandwich a bite at a time.
Any objections/comments?
Part of t
Matt Sergeant wrote:
My suggestion is that to move forwards with things we hold off on the TLP
thing for now - lets get the other parts of Kip's proposal working first.
Lets try and eat this sandwich a bite at a time.
Any objections/comments?
Part of the point of the TLP proposal was to snap people
Matt Sergeant wrote:
My suggestion is that to move forwards with things we hold off on the TLP
thing for now - lets get the other parts of Kip's proposal working first.
Lets try and eat this sandwich a bite at a time.
Any objections/comments?
-1 from me on this. I don't think doing one preclude
My suggestion is that to move forwards with things we hold off on the TLP
thing for now - lets get the other parts of Kip's proposal working first.
Lets try and eat this sandwich a bite at a time.
Any objections/comments?
--
<:->get a SMart net
I am Jack's broken heart.
