Re: [Babel-users] SIGHUP shouldn't kill babeld

2013-09-24 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:19:43PM -0500, Charles N Wyble wrote: Um. What is confusing about this? Different behaviour depending on a seemingly unrelated flag, wouldn't work with daemon managers that refuse double-fork (such as runit). On second thought, if it really needs to be tweaked, a

Re: [Babel-users] SIGHUP shouldn't kill babeld

2013-09-24 Thread Matthieu Boutier
Hello, I believe the right way should be to configure the logger for babeld so that it could use the appropriate signal. I don't know all loggers, but here is the default debian logrotate's config file for babeld: $ cat /etc/logrotate.d/babeld /var/log/babeld.log { weekly rotate 8

Re: [Babel-users] SIGHUP shouldn't kill babeld

2013-09-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:11:12 +0100, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:19:43PM -0500, Charles N Wyble wrote: Um. What is confusing about this? Different behaviour depending on a seemingly unrelated flag, wouldn't work with daemon managers that refuse double-fork (such