Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-09-03 Thread Jernej Kos
Hello! I just started working on a patch that adds export filters and the "table" action as Juliusz suggested. Jernej On 03. 09. 2015 06:32, Mitar wrote: > Hi! > > Any progress on this? I know that not yet many days have passed, but > it is pretty urgent for us, because the network grew to

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-09-03 Thread Matthieu Boutier
> I just started working on a patch that adds export filters and the > "table" action as Juliusz suggested. Arf, sorry, I was also doing one (attached). Matthieu 0001-Add-filter-to-choose-the-export-routing-table.patch Description: Binary data ___

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-09-02 Thread Mitar
Hi! Any progress on this? I know that not yet many days have passed, but it is pretty urgent for us, because the network grew to the stage where OLSR routing is unstable so we would need to switch to Babel as soon as possible. Mitar On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Jernej Kos

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-27 Thread Matthieu Boutier
The default route into its own table is used for more complex setups where you have different kinds of internet uplinks (e.g. the normal one for your traffic, a VPN for mesh traffic) We solved that particular problem in our network with source-specific routing. or where you don't want to

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Why not having a separate service which duplicates the routes you want into the tables you want? I think it's much cleaner to add filtering at the export stage. Something like export ip :: le 0 table 42 -- Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-27 Thread Henning Rogge
Yes, copying the routes with a second service just to put some of them into a different routing table sounds like a lot of unnecessary complexity. Henning On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: Why not having a separate service which

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-27 Thread Henning Rogge
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: Then we can have the following order of routing tables on routers: babel olsr babel_default olsr_default Mitar, I'll be glad to implement the hack that you require, but let's please think whether

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-27 Thread Mitar
Hi! I think that putting routes of both routing protocols in the same table gets really messy and hard to debug. And prevents any policy routing rules we might want to apply. Mitar On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: Then we can have the

[Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-26 Thread Jernej Kos
Hello! Is it possible to specify the routing table of exported routes in babeld? So for example that the default route would be put into a separate routing table from the other exported routes? Jernej signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-26 Thread Jernej Kos
Hello! Yes, but this applies to all routes. I would like to export the default route to a different routing table than all the other routes. Jernej On 26. 08. 2015 23:49, max b wrote: The `-t` flag allows you to specify a table you'd like to export routes to, or in the config file:

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-26 Thread Mitar
Hi! Just to give a bit of background, we need this to be able to run multiple routing protocols at the same time. This allows us to gradually transition to a new routing protocol (Babel). Then we can have the following order of routing tables on routers: babel olsr babel_default olsr_default

Re: [Babel-users] Specifying the routing table of exported routes

2015-08-26 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Then we can have the following order of routing tables on routers: babel olsr babel_default olsr_default Mitar, I'll be glad to implement the hack that you require, but let's please think whether we can manage to avoid it. What's wrong with putting both OLSR and Babel routes into a