Hi Luke and Juliusz! Good to hear from you. Ah, P2P DNS... thats near and
dear to my heart...
What's the context of the giant email thread below? I can glean bits and
pieces but am not sure of what the overall discussion is about.
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <
[
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Brad Neuberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Luke and Juliusz! Good to hear from you. Ah, P2P DNS... thats near and
> dear to my heart...
:)
> What's the context of the giant email thread below? I can glean bits and
> pieces but am not sure of what the overall di
>> so - a network comprising two WIMAX networks which are geographically
>> too far apart to be connected together (more than 2 miles) but a few
>> of the nodes can use GPRS / 3G to get data across between the two,
>> thus connecting the two networks together.
>>
>> ... does that work?
>
> Yep.
>> That's called policy routing, and there's a lot of published
>> papers on the subject. Babel doesn't do policy routing right now,
>> but if you convince me why it's needed, I'm quite willing to add
>> it.
> ... what you're saying is that it's not straightforward to identify /
> separate t
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > soo... http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Mesh_Network_Details#Experimenting -
> > they've ... oh. they cheated. they got marvell to do some of the
> > low-level mesh networking.
>
> It was my understanding that OLPC and
> soo... http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Mesh_Network_Details#Experimenting -
> they've ... oh. they cheated. they got marvell to do some of the
> low-level mesh networking.
It was my understanding that OLPC and Marvell collaborated on the job.
In particular, I believe that Michail Bletsas invested a
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > getting proper WAN-wide name registration and defending is _hard_.
>
> Yes, if you want to be distributed. You can always fake it with
> a centralised server.
yuk :) yes. e.g. WINS servers. WINS servers - a
> getting proper WAN-wide name registration and defending is _hard_.
Yes, if you want to be distributed. You can always fake it with
a centralised server.
> it takes about _three years_ to get it right - as no less than three
> of us found out for samba.
Yeah, but you needed to be bug-compati
hi juliusz, thanks very much for responding!
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > delighted to have accidentally encountered babel.
>
> Welcome on board.
thank you :)
>
> > i was wondering if anyone has had any experience deploying babel
> > sim
> delighted to have accidentally encountered babel.
Welcome on board.
> i was wondering if anyone has had any experience deploying babel
> simultaneously with zeroconf (!) on e.g. a truly wireless adhoc
> network.
Zeroconf is a purely link-local protocol -- it doesn't reach beyond
the local link
folks, hi,
delighted to have accidentally encountered babel. i was wondering if
anyone has had any experience deploying babel simultaneously with
zeroconf (!) on e.g. a truly wireless adhoc network. or, is the role
of zeroconf subsumed by that of babel when used in a wireless mesh
environment (do
11 matches
Mail list logo
