Hello, list.
The latest (0.99.17.8) release of Quagga-RE incorporates babeld, and FreeBSD
quagga-re port seems to deliver it in a way:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/quagga-re/pkg-plist.diff?r1=1.1;r2=1.2;f=h
I don't currently have the time to test it. Could someone test this
Dear all,
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has merged
into Quagga. This was done against the wishes of Matthieu Boutier and
myself, the main two authors of this code, and without the knowledge of
the other authors. Note that Paul did not simply ask us to add GPL
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has merged
into Quagga. This was done against the wishes of Matthieu Boutier and
myself, the main two authors of this code, and without the knowledge of
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has merged
into Quagga. This was done against the wishes of Matthieu Boutier
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:53:59AM -0500, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has merged
into Quagga. This was done against the wishes of Matthieu Boutier and
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Gabriel Kerneis
kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:53:59AM -0500, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting, Curious if the same would be held true for a BSD Licensed
work..
Yes. Precisely the same holds for BSD licensed code, which is why for
example commercial closed source projects love including that.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting, Curious if the same would be held true for a BSD Licensed
work..
Yes. Precisely the same holds for BSD licensed code,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:22:11AM -0500, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
The primary reason for using MIT/X11/BSD is precisely to allow others
to *relicense* the code as they wish. Thus, I can take pieces (whole
or in part) into my closed projects, licensed commercially. Or, into
my GPL projects,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com
wrote:
I dont think its about closing any of the code off, I think its more
about how someone can simple add other added
parameters or restrictions
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear all,
Paul Jakma has added GPL headers to the babeld code that he has merged
into Quagga. This was done against the wishes of Matthieu Boutier and
myself, the main two authors of this code, and without the knowledge of
the other authors.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Gabriel Kerneis
kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
Hmm, the licence grants explicitely the right to sublicence, which looks a
bit
different from relicence. I see your point, though.
Yes, sub-license. That's why your original copyright header remains there.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Outback Dingo wrote:
I dont think its about closing any of the code off, I think its more
about how someone can simple add other added parameters or restrictions
on the code base which was originally a more open unrestricted license
Please see:
(This is kinda duplicate because Paul said more or less the same things)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:12:24PM +0200, Gabriel Kerneis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:53:59AM -0500, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
The primary reason for using MIT/X11/BSD is precisely to allow others
to *relicense* the code as they wish.
This is correct.
Please read my initial mail again. At no point have I argued the
legality of Paul's actions. I'm simply stating that I find his actions
rude.
And I don't enjoy
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Please read my initial mail again. At no point have I argued the
legality of Paul's actions. I'm simply stating that I find his actions
rude.
And I don't enjoy working with rude people.
Thanks for that.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Please read my initial mail again. At no point have I argued the
legality of Paul's actions. I'm simply stating that I find his actions
rude.
Everyone is of course entitled to their view of the world, but when
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Please read my initial mail again. At no point have I argued the
legality of Paul's actions. I'm simply stating that I find his actions
rude.
You chose to use MIT/X11 for code that depends on other GPL code. You did
so because you told us you
18 matches
Mail list logo
