Re: [backstage] Site statistics

2006-12-11 Thread Tom Loosemore
On 11/12/06, Allan Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, Thanks for the multitude of replies about web-site statistics. The sources people pointed out are very interesting, particularly the table of what browsers the bbc test on and support. from a man who'd know... We are currently

RE: [backstage] Site statistics

2006-12-11 Thread Matthew Cashmore
Wow - I remember building a whole version of the BBC Local Radio pages and some Where I Live sites for cable... That was fun... Let me see if I can find the files, they should still be on live somewhere... m -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O

RE: [backstage] Site statistics

2006-12-11 Thread Andrew Bowden
> Tom: Many thanks for the browser breakdown for November. > Interesting that Cable receives also has high a percentage of > Safari. I suppose the up-shot is that if you make the > decision on which platforms to support from that statistic, > if you include Safari, Cable should be there as well

Re: [backstage] Site statistics

2006-12-11 Thread Allan Jardine
Hello all, Thanks for the multitude of replies about web-site statistics. The sources people pointed out are very interesting, particularly the table of what browsers the bbc test on and support. It would be absolutely excellent if a break down of the bbc statistics was to be made availab

[backstage] Have Your Say broken timestamps in RSS feeds

2006-12-11 Thread John Leach
Hi, whilst adapting News Sniffer[1] to the new Have Your Say RSS feed format, I found some mangled timestamps with the time exceeding 24:00:00. For example, in the recent "Pinochet death" thread[2] feed[3] there is an item with a dc:date field of "2006-12-11T24:40:03+". The pubDate field tra