Brendan,
Perhaps it's the RSS feeds for the podcasts? They are the only bit of
bbc.co.uk that are slow in my experience.
On 03/12/2007, Brendan Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's interesting, does anyone else find bbc.co.uk to be any slower than
other sites? I can't imagine why anyone in
http://www.betanews.com/article/Classical_music_joins_the_DRMfree_trend/1196714195
*Adding to the canon of DRM-free music, a Universal Music Group subsidiary
has made a large portion of its catalog of classical performances available
online free from digital rights protection.*
Today, a label
On 4 Dec 2007, at 01:40, Mr I Forrester wrote:
Quick note to say it was not promised, we talked about it but never
promised. We licenced it under a creative commons non-commercial
attribution licence
At the http://www.aspirationtech.org/events/opentranslation conference
it became clear that
Thanks Dave I will next time.
Ian Forrester
This e-mail is: [x] private; [] ask first; [] bloggable
Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
BC5 C3, Media Village, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TP
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: +44 (0)2080083965
mob: +44 (0)7711913293
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
They want ?44 for 320kbps MP3s of a 1975 recording of The Well-Tempered
Clavier... Pisstake? I think so. Most of their other stuff is a little more
sensibly-priced, but it's still too expensive - and not good enough quality.
Classical music buffs will stay away, preferring to get the CDs unless
This was a fascinating discussion for me -- thank you -- I listened to
it twice. I regret however that no transcript is available. I know how
much work that is -- I once interviewed someone in French for over 30
minutes, then transcribed it, then translated it -- and group
interviews are even
Also note that eMusic subscribers in the UK and elsewhere have beenable to get
DRM free 192kbps MP3s of classical (and other) music for awhile now although
obviously the label's haven't tended to be quite asprestigious.
Nick
On 12/4/07, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They want €44
On Dec 3, 2007 12:48 PM, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/12/2007, Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need the BBC to release it.
Yeah, a lot of the comments on that blog post said similar things -
that notwithstanding it would be very helpful for the community if the
On 04/12/2007, James Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delighted to let you know that after discussion with my team, we *will* be
making Perl on Rails (we'll call it something different) open-source.
It'll be licenced as openly as possible. You asked for it, so we'll give you
it.
Wow. Thread
On 04/12/2007, Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I suggest that you licence the code under the GNU Affero GPL v3
please.
I expect the BBC will use an in house licence to fit it's needs as set out
in the charter.
As an aside I still don't understand the need for GPLv3, as far as I can
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 17:18 +, nick richards wrote:
Also note that eMusic subscribers in the UK and elsewhere have been
able to get DRM free 192kbps MP3s of classical (and other) music for
a while now although obviously the label's haven't tended to be quite
as prestigious.
Linn
On 04/12/2007, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expect the BBC will use an in house licence to fit it's needs as set out
in the charter.
This makes sense, though is a little disapointing if true.
As an aside I still don't understand the need for GPLv3, as far as I can it
just adds
12 matches
Mail list logo
