BBC.co.uk not working?
The News and sport sites are OK but there might be some intermittent problems
elsewhere. Could you let me know which ISP you are on?
Cheers,
jod
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 10/17/2008 07:24
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
I've lost all my listing feeds from bbc.co.uk/ schedules overnight and I
couldn't get to Robert Peston's blog earlier.
2008/10/17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BBC.co.uk not working?
--
Brian Butterworth
http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice,
since 2002
John,
At home, I'm on Be, I couldn't listen to BBC Radio 5 Live this morning. I
could not Wake Up To Money!
Not sure about from my server's ISP, here's the traceroute...
traceroute: Warning: bbc.co.uk has multiple addresses; using 212.58.224.138
traceroute to bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.138), 30
Thanks - proving to be an intermittent issue but this helps. The service desk
are looking into it.
jod
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Butterworth
Sent: Fri 10/17/2008 08:47
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC.co.uk not
Everything seems to be OK now :D
2008/10/17 John O'Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The News and sport sites are OK but there might be some intermittent
problems elsewhere. Could you let me know which ISP you are on?
Cheers,
jod
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Iain Wallace wrote:
So it looks like C4 is shareholder-free.
Wow, every day is a school day. I never realised that. Even
so, none of my money is going towards Channel 4 so I don't
feel like it's any of my business how they digitally
distribute their programming.
In a sense, some of
2008/10/17 Kevin Hinde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Iain Wallace wrote:
So it looks like C4 is shareholder-free.
Wow, every day is a school day. I never realised that. Even
so, none of my money is going towards Channel 4 so I don't
feel like it's any of my business how they digitally
Doesn't the BBC also derive some of it's funding from non-license fee
activities? If this is the case then C4 and the BBC are both indirectly
funded by the tax payer and commercial activities although in different
proportions and to a different scale.
Since most residents are TV license payers
2008/10/17 Phil Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doesn't the BBC also derive some of it's funding from non-license fee
activities? If this is the case then C4 and the BBC are both indirectly
funded by the tax payer and commercial activities although in different
proportions and to a different scale.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
2008/10/17 Phil Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dawkins knows why UKTV uses SSSL encryption on it's satellite
services, free to air channels get all the
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted, such
as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
The reason being...?
--
Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted,
such as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
encrypt them?
The reason being...?
Sky effectively subsidise certain costs for
Frank Wales wrote:
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted,
such as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
encrypt them?
The reason being...?
The same company provides EPG and encryption
Hi folks
What's the latest news w.r.t. chances of getting access to BBC subtitle
/ closed caption data via nice clean API? Particularly for news content...
thanks for any pointers,
Dan
--
http://danbri.org/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
Quoting Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted, such
as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
The reason being...?
Sky give you a discount.
--
ST
2008/10/17 Gareth Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Wales wrote:
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted,
such as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
encrypt them?
The reason being...?
I'm not sure about a 'nice clean API' but I wrote up a wiki doc on
downloading the iPlayer closed caption data at:
http://beebhack.wikia.com/wiki/IPlayer_TV#Subtitles
Regards
Phil Lewis
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 16:10 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
Hi folks
What's the latest news w.r.t. chances
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and
unencrypted channels on the EPG, it would still seem th at rule is part
of Sky's contacts...
Sky have unencrypted and encrypted
2008/10/17 ST [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are benefits to being encrypted, such
as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
The reason being...?
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and
unencrypted channels on the EPG, it would still seem that rule is part
of Sky's contacts...
This is why, for example, Five can't just jump onto Freesat,
2008/10/17 Andrew Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Brian Butterworth
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and unencrypted
channels on the EPG, it would still seem th at rule is part of Sky's
contacts...
Sky
2008/10/17 Gareth Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and unencrypted
channels on the EPG, it would still seem that rule is part of Sky's
contacts...
This is why, for example, Five can't just jump onto Freesat, because
23 matches
Mail list logo
