2010/1/26 Kieran Kunhya kie...@kunhya.com
For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more demanding scenes.
(Except increasing the bitrate or using a better encoder will make iPlayer
look better than the broadcast...)
You do get an awful lot better results when you are not compressing
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:20, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote:
You do get an awful lot better results when you are not compressing in real
time, of course, because you can use all the MPEG4 forward references, the
ones you don't get when you real time encode.
that's a good
For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more
demanding scenes. (Except increasing the bitrate or using a
better encoder will make iPlayer look better than the
broadcast...)
You do get an awful lot better results when you
are not compressing in real time, of course, because you
can
For those with both a serious Eddie Marr habit and also have iPhones and
Droids needing ringtones, here's the 82 versions as downloadable links...
http://www.ukfree.tv/pm/
(donations to http://www.dec.org.uk/item/200 please)
--
Brian Butterworth
follow me on twitter:
From: Brian Butterworth
On DVB-T it is everything. BBC One used to have reserved bandwidth, but is
now statmuxed with everything else. My assumption is the BBC delivers
motion-JPEG to the regional encoders and the services are statmuxed from
there.
Don't know the gory technical details,
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
For 720p25 you might need more than 3.5Mbps for more
demanding scenes. (Except increasing the bitrate or using a
better encoder will make iPlayer look better than the
broadcast...)
You do get an awful lot better results when you
are not compressing in real time, of course,
On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
encoded in real-time? all of it?
I believe so.
after all, live programming is in the minority on BBC1-4, and assuming
things sit on sensible boundaries and are pre-packetised,
On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
encoded in real-time? all of it?
I believe so.
Not unless they've changed their previous policy of ingesting popular /
headline shows prior to their airing, then making
On 27 Jan 2010, at 11:59, Christopher Woods wrote:
On 27 Jan 2010, at 08:31, Mo McRoberts wrote:
that's a good point: I wonder how much of the broadcast output *is*
encoded in real-time? all of it?
I believe so.
Not unless they've changed their previous policy of ingesting popular /
That's on-demand content, not broadcast. The two are encoded
via separate systems.
Were we not talking about the iPlayer videos?... derp sidles off
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
Well exactly, there are THREE main desktops, and one doesn't and wont have
h264 preinstalled.
This wouldn't be a problem if The Guardian and other news broadcasters
stopped bystanding and made the videos they publish available in Xiph
formats earlier; they continue to squander their significant
So, what does everyone think?
(and how much effect will it have on the video situation over the
next 18 months or so, do we reckon?)
M.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial
2010/1/27 Mo McRoberts m...@nevali.net:
So, what does everyone think?
(and how much effect will it have on the video situation over the
next 18 months or so, do we reckon?)
It's just a big iPhone AFAICT*. Popularising the idea that not
everything runs Flash might be educate some web
-Original Message-
From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
[mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Mo McRoberts
Sent: 27 January 2010 22:38
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] iPad
So, what does everyone think?
(disclaimer: I generally hate Apple
14 matches
Mail list logo
