On 23-Oct-2009, at 01:14, Tom Loosemore wrote:
There’s no (public) evidence,
beyond the existence of Kangaroo, that other broadcasters are
actually all
that interested in a one-stop aggregation portal (I’d be tempted to
say
“more fool them”—right now, they need all the help they can get).
...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Mo McRoberts
Sent: 23 October 2009 08:09
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] FYI: Open iPlayer
On 23-Oct-2009, at 01:14, Tom Loosemore wrote:
Theres no (public) evidence,
beyond the existence of Kangaroo, that other broadcasters
Subject: Re: [backstage] FYI: Open iPlayer
On 23-Oct-2009, at 09:36, Andrew Pipes wrote:
Can you expand on that note about listings please Mo?
Do you want more date/time information about when a programme was
broadcast surfaced? Or a better interface for exploring back in time
instead
On 20-Oct-2009, at 21:51, I wrote:
That said, it’s never entirely clear when people talk about “licensing
iPlayer” whether they mean the front-end, with its myriad per-platform
tweaks, clever Flash applet and AIR downloader, the back-end which
ingests content, hooks it up appropriately, and
There’s no (public) evidence,
beyond the existence of Kangaroo, that other broadcasters are actually all
that interested in a one-stop aggregation portal (I’d be tempted to say
“more fool them”—right now, they need all the help they can get).
coughs http://testtubetelly.channel4.com /coughs
Sorry for the duplicate post.
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
What is so important about the content/metadata ingest and delivery
system that is the iPlayer that it needs to be licenced as opposed to
being developed in-house at a broadcaster?
Standardisation, as Mo indicated, why reinvent the wheel,
On 21-Oct-2009, at 08:42, David Tomlinson wrote:
Sorry for the duplicate post.
Kieran Kunhya wrote:
What is so important about the content/metadata ingest and delivery
system that is the iPlayer that it needs to be licenced as opposed
to being developed in-house at a broadcaster?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/20/bbc_trust_rejects_iplayer_federation/
The BBC Trust has shelved a plan that would have allowed broadcasters
such as Channel 4, ITV and Five to share the Beeb's iPlayer.
The so-called Open iPlayer project was meant to establish a new
commercial service
...@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: [backstage] FYI: Open iPlayer
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 20 October, 2009, 6:59 PM
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/20/bbc_trust_rejects_iplayer_federation/
The BBC Trust has shelved a plan that would have allowed
broadcasters such as Channel 4, ITV
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 21:31, Kieran Kunhya kie...@kunhya.com wrote:
What is so important about the content/metadata ingest and delivery system
that is the iPlayer that it needs to be licenced as opposed to being
developed in-house at a broadcaster?
Possibly the fact that no other bugger is
10 matches
Mail list logo
