Brian Butterworth wrote:
Just a question.
On Monday BBC World is going to become BBC World News.
That's silly.
And News 24 seems like a pretty strong brand to me.
-Tim
--
www.tdobson.net
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us
still has one object.
If
On 17/04/2008, Tim Dobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Just a question.
On Monday BBC World is going to become BBC World News.
That's silly.
And News 24 seems like a pretty strong brand to me.
And it clearly passes the Ronseal test, which is all a brand has to
Brian - don't think this is the list to get feedback on the image shift of News
24 - this is after all the developer list for the BBC, not a general BBC
Discussion list ;-)
I'd suggest that you move this to a more relevant list (don't ask I don't know
one) or contact News 24 directly via the
try saying it's not technical when you're trying to get the /programmes news 24
urls right ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matthew Cashmore
Sent: Tue 4/15/2008 2:37 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Question.. is denuding News 24
a better
bit of branding ... especially as the channel covers more than just raw news
stuff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ryan Morrison
Sent: 15 April 2008 14:55
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Question.. is denuding
On 15/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saying BBC News doesn't make much sense either as there are lots of BBC News
programme transmissions other than News 24 (notwithstanding the fact that so
many of the transmissions have more or less the same content, so it doesn't
really
There's a few clauses in the CA license that the current version of the CC
licences don't support - specifically the No-Endorsements and UK-only
specifications. However, if the Beeb (and their partners in the CA project
could be prepared to drop the UK-only clause - which would appear to be a
not
Believe not so due to licensing / royalty agreements, hence their Creative
Archive license instead. Could be wrong, but that's from memory so ymmv.
It makes sense to me, don't fix what's not broken etc.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Joly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March
8 matches
Mail list logo
