[backstage] New backstage

2006-10-11 Thread Richard P Edwards
How about cutting to the chase and opening a BBC Tube? Or at least positively listing all source data freely available from the BBC, including feeds that are under future legal construction, or waiting licensing agreement in the corridors of power?Surely the major role of the BBC now is to deliver

RE: [backstage] New backstage.bbc.co.uk website

2006-10-11 Thread Clare OLeary
hi that sounds like a cool idea, instead of what programmers say people want, get it straight from the audience. a txt voting scheme for best ideas could be integrated into the online thing too - this could also have niche interest areas catered for in some kind of self selective process...

Re: [backstage] New backstage.bbc.co.uk website

2006-10-11 Thread Neil Roberts
How about some sort of matching service between people with the ideas and the people with a knowhow to implement them. You could for example open up the ideas section to more main stream sections of the bbc audience a kind of 'tell us what you want suggestion service'. Then based on that you put th

RE: [backstage] Hi... what news do you want today?

2006-10-11 Thread Jose-Carlos Mariategui
-Original Message- From: "Mario Menti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Sent: 04-Oct-06 08:48 Subject: Re: [backstage] Hi... what news do you want today? On 10/4/06, Mr I Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unlike Matthew, I have a great relationship with my host an

RE: [backstage] media feeds

2006-10-11 Thread Ian Forrester
Sorry Stewart, There are no feeds or XML of BBC2 video at this present moment. Cheers, Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stewart Abel Sent: 11 October 2006 00:52 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: [

Re: [backstage] New backstage.bbc.co.uk website

2006-10-11 Thread Gordon Joly
At 15:55 +0100 10/10/06, Mr I Forrester wrote: Gordon Joly wrote: At 18:37 +0100 5/10/06, Brian Butterworth wrote: Perhaps there should be a 'tech' and 'no-tech' version of the site. You mean like "us and them"? Gordo That's certainly something we are trying to get away from - us and th