Hi Robert,
I'm on the joost waiting list, but really itching to try it out. If
you've still got a spare invite, I'd be most gracious.
Cheers,
Phil
On 18/01/07, Robert Kerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Email me if you'd like an invite - not sure how many I can give out though.
:o)
Rob
evilgre
Hi Michael,
The label's prefix is always in the ISRC code this may explain
further...
http://www.riaa.com/issues/audio/isrc_faq.asp
My understanding is that the code is attached to the original and
unique recording. so many recordings of the same song can have
different codes... bu
almost staying on topic and because this discussion hasn't kicked off
yet i thought i'd throw this in:
after scooting around http://www.virginradio.co.uk/ i was wondering
clearly u have lots of tracklistings
clearly we have a fair few
but if u flip between radio 3, radio 1, 1xtra, Later etc the
> Now - an aside - Musicbrainz was set up because of Gracenote.
>If I understand correctly, the dataset that Gracenote CDDB is based on
>was orginally an 'open' database with information contributed by the
>public. It was sold, and changed its licensing structures away from the
>original open
On the subject of ISRC codes I've spoken to some of the production
people about this
Apparently they're supposed to uniquely identify the audio object
So if a track appears on a single and also appears on an album with
EXACTLY the same recording it should have the same isrc code
BUT
apparently labe
James
Firstly a vague attempt to put your mind at rest about "why the BBC is
now looking at putting third-party music information services out of
business".
If you mean we plan to make a service that competes with allmusic etc we
don't [honest]. We just want to be able to better represent music
"Michael Smethurst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All tru
> Brainz has "advanced relationships" to break "Paul Simon and Art
> Garfunkel" into "paul Simon" and "Art Garfunkel" (bad example I know)
> And for that matter "Peter Andre and Jordan" into "Peter Andre" and
> "Jordan"
> [http://tinyurl.co
All tru
Brainz has "advanced relationships" to break "Paul Simon and Art
Garfunkel" into "paul Simon" and "Art Garfunkel" (bad example I know)
And for that matter "Peter Andre and Jordan" into "Peter Andre" and
"Jordan"
[http://tinyurl.com/2yxx76]
David
Thanks for the pointer to http://pingthesem
The pubs are obviously open.
Cheers,
Rich.
On 1/26/07, Brian Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear
--- Richard P Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
May I ask you who do you think music is made for?
Who makes the music?
If it comes from inspiration then it belongs to us
all!
Thereby hides the sins
Dear
--- Richard P Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
May I ask you who do you think music is made for?
Who makes the music?
If it comes from inspiration then it belongs to us
all!
Thereby hides the sins of man, he takes that which he
does not make and uses to feather his own nest!
Have a nice day!
Now - an aside - Musicbrainz was set up because of Gracenote. If I
understand correctly, the dataset that Gracenote CDDB is based on was
orginally an 'open' database with information contributed by the public.
It was sold, and changed its licensing structures away from the original
open source mode
I've been lurking on the Musicbrainz dev list for years; iirc, there is
some hidden category to make duets/collaborations like that resolve to
two artists.
It may well be worth finding their list archives to check we're not
about to rediscuss all of the conversations!
(Is Rob Mayhem and Chaos on
"Andrew Bowden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "James Cridland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Though looking at the big screen on the wall, the vast majority of users
>> > seem content with Windows Media (over 80% of our online listeners right
>> > now).
>
>> Do you think those of us who aren't
> "James Cridland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Though looking at the big screen on the wall, the vast majority of users
> > seem content with Windows Media (over 80% of our online listeners right
> > now).
> Do you think those of us who aren't content should complain more?
> I complain sometim
> One might argue that the BBC should make their radio stations available in
> as many different ways as possible, to satisfy as many users as possible:
> after all, we pay for it.
The flip side is that every format you add, has some extra setup costs of
various magnitudes, and when belts have t
15 matches
Mail list logo
