Re: [backstage] Radio 1 on Twitter
On 2/20/07, Tristan Ferne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another hack/prototype: Partly inspired by Martin's (http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/prototypes/archives/2007/02/tv_twitter.html) and Mario's (http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/prototypes/archives/2007/01/bbc_news_just_s. html) experiments we've put Radio 1 up on Twitter - including updates on what track is now playing and what people are texting in about. http://twitter.com/bbcradio1 What amused me is that I mentioned this at the Backstage bash (I can do now-playing on Virgin really easily with this!) - and everyone rolled their eyes and thought I was desperately sad. I now know that everyone was thinking shit, give me three months and we might be able to code something up for Radio 1. Gauntlet? Thrown. -- http://james.cridland.net/
Re: [backstage] World Service Hourly Bulliten podcast
Well the Now Show and From our own correspondent have been down since at least Saturday though the World Today Select bulletin has come back up. Thank goodness for Audio Hijack Pro Cheers, Matt Thankyou to those who donated to my rowing challenge. We manged to raise over £3000 ($6000) for Teesside Hospice. England expects that every man will do his duty - Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson, 21st October 1805 Matthew A. C. Lamont [EMAIL PROTECTED] WNSL - West, Room 309phone: (203) 432 5834 Physics Department, Yale University fax: (203) 432 8926 P.O. Box 208124 272 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06520-8124, USA - On 22 Feb 2007, at 05:05, Carlos Roman wrote: There was a problem with uploading the podcasts (general BBC ones) yesterday but it should be resolved now. Also, just noticed that the newest one for World Service is up but the feed hasn't validated properly. This should be sorted out pretty soon. -C. Guys, Dunno if you're the right group but it doesn't look like the podcast has been updated since 10am yesterday. Cheers, Phil. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/ mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail- archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
[backstage] BBC TV for expats?
Now then all, When the BBC is thinking about making content available on the web, is it considering foreign markets? Here in the US we have BBC America which is frankly rubbish and contains mainly shows selling antiques and Benny Hill re-runs. What many of us expats crave for are good documentaries from BBC 2/4. I realise that there are rights issues with a lot of stuff which is why we can't listen to live sports on the BBC radio player, but can this be got round if there is an international BBC licence fee. With a million ex-pats alone in the NY/NJ/CT tri-state area in the north- east US, then I think it would be something worth pursuing. Myself and friends that I talk to would love to stump up some cash if it meant we got access to these programs. For now though, long live UK Nova and other services ... Cheers, Matt Thank you to those who donated to my rowing challenge. We managed to raise over £3000 ($6000) for Teesside Hospice. England expects that every man will do his duty - Admiral Horatio Lord Nelson, 21st October 1805 Matthew A. C. Lamont [EMAIL PROTECTED] WNSL - West, Room 309phone: (203) 432 5834 Physics Department, Yale University fax: (203) 432 8926 P.O. Box 208124 272 Whitney Avenue New Haven, CT 06520-8124, USA - - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
[backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Hi All, The video form the 1st Backstage podcast is now up - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/bbc_backstage_p_1.html and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Cheers, Ian - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
RE: [backstage] World Service Hourly Bulliten podcast
Thanks for the info, we're looking into this. -C. Well the Now Show and From our own correspondent have been down since at least Saturday though the World Today Select bulletin has come back up. Thank goodness for Audio Hijack Pro Cheers, Matt - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] BBC and YouTube deal for real??
That's a scary prospect, besides isn't that what sumo.tv and E4 are for ? On 2/22/07, Jim Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's more likely to be YouTube content on the beeb rather than the other way around, isn't it? On 21 Feb 2007, at 21:37, vijay chopra wrote: OK, many of you will have seen this by now: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/21/1636247 http://www.techsmessage.com/2007/02/21/bbc-and-youtube-in-deal-talks/ But considering all the IP talk that's been going on on the list, is this for real, and if so does anyone know what exactly the Beeb might be planning?? Free Beeb content on YouTube would be good, what purpose would it serve? -- You can't build a reputation based on what you are going to do.
[backstage] Sky MPEG4 Freeview subscription
Hi, You are all probably quite aware that Sky have said they wish to remove their free-to-air channels from Freeview and replace them with a subscription service that is based on MPEG4. Despite the fact they haven't even gotten around to asking Ofcom for permission, a petition to 'keep Freeview free' has been started, in the style of the road charging one. HYPERLINK http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SkyPayOnFreeview/http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Sky PayOnFreeview/ Brian Butterworth HYPERLINK http://www.ukfree.tv/www.ukfree.tv -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 21/02/2007 15:19
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Re: Arrington OMFG!! On 2/22/07, Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, The video form the 1st Backstage podcast is now up - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/bbc_backstage_p_1.html and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Cheers, Ian - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
btw: I just added Ian's blip.tv video feed to our podcast.com video folder http://podcast.com/show/6951 I will attempt to clean up the audio from last night's geekdinner event and get that online soon too. (Also to rip out the audio of Mike saying his piece and post to my blog) ;) On 2/22/07, blogHUD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: Arrington OMFG!! On 2/22/07, Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, The video form the 1st Backstage podcast is now up - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/bbc_backstage_p_1.html and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Cheers, Ian - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Sky MPEG4 Freeview subscription
Hmm.. It's great that people are actively resisting this, but to reiterate a point made earlier on the Open Rights Group list concerning the iPlayer petition on pm.gov.uk, is this really the best forum for protest? IMO the idea that the PM (or any branch of government) should step in to legislate what should and should not be shown on television is a slightly scary prospect Will forward the post from the ORG list for reference, for all those not subscribed... Cheers, Tim On 2/22/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, You are all probably quite aware that Sky have said they wish to remove their free-to-air channels from Freeview and replace them with a subscription service that is based on MPEG4. Despite the fact they haven't even gotten around to asking Ofcom for permission, a petition to 'keep Freeview free' has been started, in the style of the road charging one. http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SkyPayOnFreeview/ Brian Butterworth www.ukfree.tv -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 21/02/2007 15:19
[backstage] Fwd: [ORG-discuss] BBC iPlayer Petition
Forwarding for reference: ORG list responses to the BBC iPlayer petition on pm.gov.uk Cheers, Tim -- Forwarded message -- From: David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Feb 22, 2007 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [ORG-discuss] BBC iPlayer Petition To: Open Rights Group open discussion list [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 22/02/07, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mmmm ... I think the fact that the Trust put question 5 in their request for comments, phrased as it was - a direct invitation to supply them with cluebats with which to beat the people responsible for a Windows-only proposal over the head with - indicates that they're far from clueless on this matter themselves. (forgot to note) - remembering that the Trust isn't allowed that sort of direct hands-on influence any more than the PM's office is, although their raised eyebrows are taken pretty seriously inside the BBC as I understand it. That they phrased question 5 that way says precisely what they think of the idea IMO. - d. ___ ORG-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.openrightsgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/org-discuss
RE: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
If that's you in the background going WHAT?!, I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments. The whole point of the BBC, at least to me, is that as it's insulated to an extent from wider market forces, that is what gives it the freedom to innovate to a greater extent and spend more on RD, to bring those innovations to market and help develop the standards more than many other broadcasters. The public service remit is unique in that it's looking out for the consumer, not just the broadcaster, and if he doesn't see that (or he's been put off by the meagre output of BBC America, which is a separate branch of the Beeb anyway, right?) then he's a bit of an idiot. And here's me thinking he actually had a bit of nouse when it comes to future tech... Arrington should stick to reporting on indie Web 2.0 startups and leave criticism or appraisal of the BBC and its output to people who get a use from it - us crazy embracers know a good thing when we see it (and I for one gladly pay that license fee!) I absolutely _LOVE_ that pregnant pause after your man explains about the Public Value Test. Arrington didn't see that one coming. :D -Original Message- From: Mr I Forrester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 February 2007 15:44 To: BBC Backstage Subject: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington Hi All, The video form the 1st Backstage podcast is now up - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/bbc_backstage _p_1.html and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Cheers, Ian - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
RE: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Oh no!!! By the time the mic was on and everyone was looking at me I had no idea what I was saying! Arrrgghhh... Daniel Morris | Web Developer BBC Entertainment : Manchester : New Media int. 01 44217 ext. 0161 244 4217 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of blogHUD Sent: 22 February 2007 17:42 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington btw: I just added Ian's blip.tv video feed to our podcast.com video folder http://podcast.com/show/6951 I will attempt to clean up the audio from last night's geekdinner event and get that online soon too. (Also to rip out the audio of Mike saying his piece and post to my blog) ;) On 2/22/07, blogHUD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: Arrington OMFG!! On 2/22/07, Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, The video form the 1st Backstage podcast is now up - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/bbc_backstage_p_1.html and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Cheers, Ian - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Radio 1 on Twitter
On 2/22/07, Tristan Ferne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You shouldn't take any notice of people who think you're ideas are desperately sad. I'd never take any notice of anyone then, and where would be the fun in that? Or mention good ideas at a BBC backstage bash! Though, honestly, I wasn't there. ...and more like 3 hours. I've not started yet; and not too convinced I want to clutter up Twitter with 'now-playing' stuff, the more I think about it... maybe *you're* the one who's desperately sad! (grin) j
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Mr I Forrester wrote: and you might want to check out the comments from Mike TechCrunch Arrington on the BBC - http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/news/archives/2007/02/michael_arringt.html Is there some more background to what he said? The BBC should be dissolved is a fairly strong statement, and I would have thought there'd be at least a few words either before or after as to why the BBC should be dissolved (and I'd rather not have to trudge through a a video to find it). - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
blogHUD wrote: I have posted the audio here: http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ download! share! mock! taunt! ;) Maybe I'm going deaf, but the audio isn't audible - I've got my speakers turned up full blast, and while there is enough sound to know that there is something there, it's still not audible. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
i tried processing the audio through 'Levelator' (an audio normalisation app) as the original panel audio was waaay quieter than Ian spitting out his coffee ;) I could quite hear the context before he said if, in the video, but he did say 'this is bullsh*t' before saying it. hopefully some kind of 'official' recording of this event will surface at some stage. ;) On 2/22/07, Scot McSweeney-Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: blogHUD wrote: I have posted the audio here: http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ download! share! mock! taunt! ;) Maybe I'm going deaf, but the audio isn't audible - I've got my speakers turned up full blast, and while there is enough sound to know that there is something there, it's still not audible. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
could*nt* hear... - sorry On 2/22/07, blogHUD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i tried processing the audio through 'Levelator' (an audio normalisation app) as the original panel audio was waaay quieter than Ian spitting out his coffee ;) I could quite hear the context before he said if, in the video, but he did say 'this is bullsh*t' before saying it. hopefully some kind of 'official' recording of this event will surface at some stage. ;) On 2/22/07, Scot McSweeney-Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: blogHUD wrote: I have posted the audio here: http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ download! share! mock! taunt! ;) Maybe I'm going deaf, but the audio isn't audible - I've got my speakers turned up full blast, and while there is enough sound to know that there is something there, it's still not audible. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Scot McSweeney-Roberts wrote: Maybe I'm going deaf, but the audio isn't audible - I've got my speakers turned up full blast, and while there is enough sound to know that there is something there, it's still not audible. I take it back (partially). I swapped speakers and I got to at least hear a bit of it - but I still had problems with parts of it being unitelligable. I don't suppose there's a transcript anywhere? - - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] HD-DVD how DRM was defeated
Dave, The fact you deliberately linked to the print version of Vanity Fair - thus removing the chance of the publishers to earn money from your visit from advertising, and/or effectively market the other content on their website, is very telling. I am deeply sorry that you don't want people to earn money from creative work; and disappointed that you object to the idea that content-creators need to control the distribution of their content. You've made your point very clearly on this list a number of times. It's now turning from charmingly naive discussion to something rather more irritating. Perhaps, for the sake of all our sanity, I could leave it with this real-world observation, that I hope even you agree with. - Some content-creators will want to have 'Content Restriction And Protection' on their content. - Some content-creators will choose not to have 'crap' in their content. - It's the content-creators choice to have crap in their content or not. - Some consumers won't want content with crap in it. - But some consumers won't care whether the content has crap in it or not. - Ultimately, the consumer will choose whether they want crap or no crap. - Content-creators may gain more benefit from controlling the use of their crappy content. - But content-creators may gain more benefit from leaving the crap out of their content. - The gamble for the content-creator is whether to put the crap in or leave the crap out. - Content-creators need to make the right individual choice. - Consumers need to make the right individual choice. - We both need to understand and respect each other's right to choose. -- http://james.cridland.net/
RE: [backstage] Sky MPEG4 Freeview subscription
Tim Cowlishaw wrote: Hmm.. It's great that people are actively resisting this, but to reiterate a point made earlier on the Open Rights Group list concerning the iPlayer petition on pm.gov.uk http://pm.gov.uk, is this really the best forum for protest? IMO the idea that the PM (or any branch of government) should step in to legislate what should and should not be shown on television is a slightly scary prospect You would think the market would decide. Seeing as Pay DTT has been one failure after another, I have to wonder why Sky would really want to get involved in Pay DTT, especially when it would be incompatible with every DTT receiver out there (so they'd have to subsidize boxes, something that worked so well for ON Digital). If it's anything like the Sky By Wire service on Homechoice, it'll be overpriced compared to the DSAT offerings, so I doubt many Freeviewers will be tempted. And if they did offer it for a reasonable price, they might start cannibalizing their DSAT viewers. Oh, and Sky were prevented once by the OFT from having any part in the terrestrial encyption system, as they were part of the British Digital Broadcasting group that became Ondigital. Anyway, aren't Ofcom the people to complain to about this and not the online petitions site (which, as the recent road charging and ID card petitions has shown, doesn't appear to influence anything anyway)? People did and Ofcom ignored them... http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/paytv/responses/ If anyone can get over 1.8 million people to sign in six months, then the newspapers will have another feeding frenzy. And I recon there are 13.5 million receivers out there, with 7 million homes being 'Freeview only', so plenty of people to sign. (Perhaps that's what Sky wants, millions of people saying how much they LOVE Sky News, Sky Sports News and Sky Three... ) Brian Butterworth www.ukfree.tv -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 21/02/2007 15:19 - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] Radio 1 on Twitter
More Twitter nonsense :-) Been making it talk... http://www.latedecember.co.uk/sites/personal/davy/arch_d7_2007_02_17.html#e143 Davy http://twitter.com/daftspaniel -- Davy Mitchell Blog - http://www.latedecember.co.uk/sites/personal/davy/ Mood News - BBC News Headlines Auto-Classified as Good, Bad or Neutral. http://www.latedecember.co.uk/sites/moodnews/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
RE: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington
Here's the short clip of that video with just Michael's comments, and the reaction - it's about 30 seconds in... Ian's coffee doesn't make an appearance but his rather loud WHAT!?... does :-) http://blip.tv/file/154710/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ian Forrester Sent: Thu 2/22/2007 8:09 PM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington I remember looking around and there was a camera man but he kept moving around with his huge betacam. So I expect there was no official recording because of the shifting around. There was also no real powerful amplification of voices besides the little tinny speakers in the desks. However there were at least 70 people in that large room, and trust me bullsh*t was used. I have the whole video if you want to watch it for context is here (still waiting for Blip to transcode it to Flash) - http://blip.tv/file/154369/ I'm surprised no one else has blogged it, Suw must have missed the discussion which took place at lunchtime - http://strange.corante.com/ Oh well, another reason to start a UK Valleywag? Hummm, shall I stick that in the ideas section? Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of blogHUD Sent: 22 February 2007 19:01 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] A couple of things including Arrington could*nt* hear... - sorry On 2/22/07, blogHUD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i tried processing the audio through 'Levelator' (an audio normalisation app) as the original panel audio was waaay quieter than Ian spitting out his coffee ;) I could quite hear the context before he said if, in the video, but he did say 'this is bullsh*t' before saying it. hopefully some kind of 'official' recording of this event will surface at some stage. ;) On 2/22/07, Scot McSweeney-Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: blogHUD wrote: I have posted the audio here: http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/ download! share! mock! taunt! ;) Maybe I'm going deaf, but the audio isn't audible - I've got my speakers turned up full blast, and while there is enough sound to know that there is something there, it's still not audible. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
