2008/10/17 Gareth Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Brian Butterworth wrote:
>
> Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and unencrypted
> channels on the EPG, it would still seem that rule is part of Sky's
> contacts...
>
> This is why, for example, Five can't just jump onto Freesat,
2008/10/17 Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Brian Butterworth
> Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and unencrypted
> channels on the EPG, it would still seem th at rule is part of Sky's
> contacts..
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and
unencrypted channels on the EPG, it would still seem that rule is part
of Sky's contacts...
This is why, for example, Five can't just jump onto Freesat,
2008/10/17 ST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Quoting Frank Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Andrew Bowden wrote:
>>
>>> Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted, such
>>> as reduced EPG listing fees.
>>>
>>
>> It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Given there are no companies that have both unencrypted and
unencrypted channels on the EPG, it would still seem th at rule is part
of Sky's contacts...
Sky have unencrypted and encrypted channel
I'm not sure about a 'nice clean API' but I wrote up a wiki doc on
downloading the iPlayer closed caption data at:
http://beebhack.wikia.com/wiki/IPlayer_TV#Subtitles
Regards
Phil Lewis
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 16:10 +0100, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> What's the latest news w.r.t. chances
2008/10/17 Gareth Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Frank Wales wrote:
> > Andrew Bowden wrote:
> > > Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted,
> > > such as reduced EPG listing fees.
> >
> > It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
> > encrypt them?
> > The
Quoting Frank Wales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Andrew Bowden wrote:
Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted, such
as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
The reason being...?
Sky give you a discount.
--
ST
Hi folks
What's the latest news w.r.t. chances of getting access to BBC subtitle
/ closed caption data via nice clean API? Particularly for news content...
thanks for any pointers,
Dan
--
http://danbri.org/
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
> Frank Wales wrote:
> Andrew Bowden wrote:
> > Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted,
> > such as reduced EPG listing fees.
>
> It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
> encrypt them?
> The reason being...?
The same company provides EPG and encryp
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Andrew Bowden wrote:
> > Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted,
> > such as reduced EPG listing fees.
> It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you
> encrypt them?
> The reason being...?
Sky effectively subsidise certain cos
Andrew Bowden wrote:
> Even for smaller channels, there are "benefits" to being encrypted, such
> as reduced EPG listing fees.
It costs less to tell people about your programmes if you encrypt them?
The reason being...?
--
Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussi
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
2008/10/17 Phil Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dawkins knows why UKTV uses SSSL encryption on it's satellite
services, free to air channels get all the v
2008/10/17 Phil Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Doesn't the BBC also derive some of it's funding from non-license fee
> activities? If this is the case then C4 and the BBC are both indirectly
> funded by the tax payer and commercial activities although in different
> proportions and to a different sca
Doesn't the BBC also derive some of it's funding from non-license fee
activities? If this is the case then C4 and the BBC are both indirectly
funded by the tax payer and commercial activities although in different
proportions and to a different scale.
Since most residents are TV license payers an
2008/10/17 Kevin Hinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Iain Wallace wrote:
> > > So it looks like C4 is shareholder-free.
> >
> > Wow, every day is a school day. I never realised that. Even
> > so, none of my money is going towards Channel 4 so I don't
> > feel like it's any of my business how they digitall
Iain Wallace wrote:
> > So it looks like C4 is shareholder-free.
>
> Wow, every day is a school day. I never realised that. Even
> so, none of my money is going towards Channel 4 so I don't
> feel like it's any of my business how they digitally
> distribute their programming.
In a sense, some
Everything seems to be OK now :D
2008/10/17 John O'Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The News and sport sites are OK but there might be some intermittent
> problems elsewhere. Could you let me know which ISP you are on?
>
> Cheers,
>
> jod
>
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks - proving to be an intermittent issue but this helps. The service desk
are looking into it.
jod
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Butterworth
Sent: Fri 10/17/2008 08:47
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] BBC.co.uk not working
John,
At home, I'm on Be, I couldn't listen to BBC Radio 5 Live this morning. I
could not "Wake Up To Money!"
Not sure about from my server's ISP, here's the traceroute...
traceroute: Warning: bbc.co.uk has multiple addresses; using 212.58.224.138
traceroute to bbc.co.uk (212.58.224.138), 30 ho
I've lost all my listing feeds from bbc.co.uk/ schedules overnight and I
couldn't get to Robert Peston's blog earlier.
2008/10/17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BBC.co.uk not working?
>
--
Brian Butterworth
http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice,
since 2002
21 matches
Mail list logo