Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Butterworth
2008/10/21 Steve Jolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Brian Butterworth wrote: > >> You could, perhaps, make high bitrate versions available to platform >> providers, with a limited number of feeds for the likes of LiveStation and >> Zattoo and the like. >> > > Intuitively, that strikes me as opening up *d

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Steve Jolly
Brian Butterworth wrote: You could, perhaps, make high bitrate versions available to platform providers, with a limited number of feeds for the likes of LiveStation and Zattoo and the like. Intuitively, that strikes me as opening up *different* cans of worms... S - Sent via the backstage.bb

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Butterworth
2008/10/21 Gareth Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Christopher Woods wrote: > > However, as the infrastructure is already there for UK > > streaming, with minimal extra expenditure required to provide > > this simulcast higher bitrate service, and with every UK > > taxpayer funding the WS in some small

RE: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Gareth Davis
Christopher Woods wrote: > However, as the infrastructure is already there for UK > streaming, with minimal extra expenditure required to provide > this simulcast higher bitrate service, and with every UK > taxpayer funding the WS in some small form, how come the > Powers That Be have defined i

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Butterworth
2008/10/21 Ant Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Having said that, and my earlier point about low bit rates actually > being better for reaching the audiences they're tyring to get to, the > higher bit rates do exist. If anyone in backstage would like to > suggest something we could do with better qua

RE: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Christopher Woods
> The web streams are something we are currently looking at, > there are a lot of things happening behind the scenes at the > moment. But you can expect some higher bitrates and new > formats in the coming months. As others have said, we are > funded differently to the rest of BBC Radio and hav

RE: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Gareth Davis
Christopher Woods wrote: > This one's a late night, in-the-kitchen thought. I turned the > radio on while I was making a cup of tea and of course, after > R4 closedown the WS is simulcast. On FM, you get a wonderful, > crisp stereo feed. On DAB, the WS feed is fine when listening > to the Radio

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Ant Miller
Having said that, and my earlier point about low bit rates actually being better for reaching the audiences they're tyring to get to, the higher bit rates do exist. If anyone in backstage would like to suggest something we could do with better quality streams at low cost (i.e. none!) then fire awa

Re: [backstage] ping.fm

2008-10-21 Thread Peter Bowyer
2008/10/21 Brian Butterworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sunday: added 23 social networks to my ping.fm account. > Tuesday: http://ping.fm has disappeared! Has it been credit crunched? > Is it to return? Or do I need to change 23 passwords? They're having problems with GoDaddy. Definitely not dead.

RE: [backstage] ping.fm

2008-10-21 Thread Aaron Scullion
They appear to be working on the problem. Status updates can be found here - http://twitter.com/pingfm Aaron From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth Sent: 21 October 2008 13:57 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: [back

[backstage] ping.fm

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Butterworth
Sunday: added 23 social networks to my ping.fm account. Tuesday: http://ping.fm has disappeared! Has it been credit crunched? Is it to return? Or do I need to change 23 passwords? -- Brian Butterworth http://www.ukfree.tv - independent digital television and switchover advice, since 2002

RE: [backstage] iPlayer: Sky re-invents web links

2008-10-21 Thread Andrew Bowden
> > Couldn't really let this one pass without comment: > > http://blog.wotsat.com/page/whatsat?entry=sky_re_invents_web_links > > "In perhaps one of the most disingenuous claims in the history of > > marketing, Sky and the BBC have announced a deal to combine > > Sky Player > > and iPlayer. > ht

RE: [backstage] iPlayer: Sky re-invents web links

2008-10-21 Thread Kevin Hinde
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian > Butterworth > Sent: 20 October 2008 14:19 > To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk > Subject: [backstage] iPlayer: Sky re-invents web links > > Couldn't really let this one pass without comment: > > h

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Butterworth
2008/10/21 Christopher Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This one's a late night, in-the-kitchen thought. I turned the radio on > while > I was making a cup of tea and of course, after R4 closedown the WS is > simulcast. On FM, you get a wonderful, crisp stereo feed. On DAB, the WS > feed is fine when l

Re: [backstage] Why the poor bitrates on World Service, Asian Network etc?

2008-10-21 Thread Ant Miller
Pretty sure the bombers use AM radio to check for the ongoing existence of Broadcasting House, and Sceptre isn't a bomber (they're all V class boats). Re the WS bitrate, these are worth revisiting, but it's possible that the budget and hence the bitrate for WS is entirely seperately worked out, be