Or, of course, you could have pages of text that crossfade - have no scroll
at all.
They would be much better in that format anyway, because if you ever want to
look at the credits, you are going to be using iPlayer or a PVR anyway and
the freeze frame would be highly legible.
On 8 March 2010 14:
> Who said we were deinterlacing to 25p? :-)
Looks like 12p for sports programming ;)
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstag
On 8 Mar 2010, at 11:31, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> Clearly you need a motion-compensated deinterlacer. ;-)
>>
>
> It's still not going to be as good in 25p as it will in 50i in my opinion
> unless the scroll speed is reduced. Though judging by recent attempts to
> destroy end credits on virtual
> Clearly you need a motion-compensated deinterlacer. ;-)
>
It's still not going to be as good in 25p as it will in 50i in my opinion
unless the scroll speed is reduced. Though judging by recent attempts to
destroy end credits on virtually every channel I doubt slower speeds will be
tolerated.
On 8 Mar 2010, at 09:04, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
From: Brian Butterworth
>> Subject: Re: [backstage] RE: BBC Flash video and deinterlacing - is this
>> really the best we can get?
>> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
>> Date: Sunday, 7 March, 2010, 19:15
>> It occurre
> From: Brian Butterworth
> Subject: Re: [backstage] RE: BBC Flash video and deinterlacing - is this
> really the best we can get?
> To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
> Date: Sunday, 7 March, 2010, 19:15
> It occurred to me the other day that one
> solution to the problem mig
It occurred to me the other day that one solution to the problem might be to
delinterlace the scrolling credits used at the end of programmes on the
originals. It might even make them easier to read.
On 6 March 2010 08:34, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > Don't TV Catchup
> > have both a low- and h
> Don't TV Catchup
> have both a low- and high- quality streams, where the HQ
> ones are
> interlaced?
> Not aware of multiple streams -
> only ever watch at the
> highest possible quality :) However, it
> certainly doesn't look like
> it's been encoded as interlaced (which would make
> a
Don't TV Catchup have both a low- and high- quality streams, where the HQ
ones are interlaced?
Not aware of multiple streams - only ever watch at the highest possible
quality :) However, it certainly doesn't look like it's been encoded as
interlaced (which would make absolutely NO sense whatso
Don't TV Catchup have both a low- and high- quality streams, where the HQ
ones are interlaced?
On 28 February 2010 21:27, Christopher Woods wrote:
> Watching the CA v. US icehockey final, I noticed - once again - that the
> BBC
> Sports online stream, at [1], is horribly deinterlaced. Image sampl
Watching the CA v. US icehockey final, I noticed - once again - that the BBC
Sports online stream, at [1], is horribly deinterlaced. Image sample: [2].
However, TVCatchup's BBC2 stream, at [3], which sources from Freeview, looks
fine. How come TVC can do a better job at progressive video than the B
11 matches
Mail list logo
