Just for the record, I have a UK-focused site, so I have these figures for
March 2007:
HYPERLINK "http://www.ukfree.tv"www.ukfree.tv
Internet explorer is 66% of all traffic.
of which 7.0 52% (34.63% of total); 6.0 47% (31.4% of total), 5.0 (0.8% of
total)
(Firefox is 28.78% of total, Opera 1% of
I've always found that the more "technical" or "geeky" a site is, the
higher %age of non-IE users you'll find. For a consumer website - IE
all the way. Which goes to prove my point that real people use IE,
geeks use Firefox. :-)
Yesterday's stats from a (very much consumer-orientated) site tha
Here's a chunk of stats. This is based on Page views. Anything below
about 100k page views is registering as Zero percent, FYI, although each
browser listed is showing *some* page impressions. 3 page views were in
IE1.5! How sweet.
I've stripped out the PI numbers, sorry, as I think that might be
Just for fun: the february data reworked to show the different flavours
of IE at their appropriate % point. There's not much difference between
Safari (all versions) and IE5.5 share. Again, I can't break out the
different flavours of FF and Safari. Bear in mind this is % of PIs, not
of users, so he
Thanks Kim
These are fab. Would be great if the BBC had somewhere where it
published this information on a regular basis?
While we're on the subject of browser testing, is anyone else using
Yahoo's Graded Browser Support method?
G
On 26/03/07, Kim Plowright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just for
Martin (who might be on here later) put this article together which
could also be of interest.
http://www.currybet.net/articles/user_agents/index.php
"before I knew it I was involved in a lengthy statistical analysis of
the browsers and operating systems that request the BBC homepage at
http://www.
Something I noticed earlier today - the BBC News pages show how many pages
have been served in the past minute, and that cycles round with other facts
about the site... When I was looking earlier this morning (around middayish)
it showed over 73,000 pages served THAT MINUTE - that's insane! Right n
The annual report designers like big numbers too..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/review_report_research/bb
cannualreport.pdf
Lots of boxes saying interesting things like:
"56% of children in Great Britain aged 7-15 accessed bbc.co.uk/CBBC in
December 2005"
"91.6% of programming
Here's a thought regarding subtitling - I know that manual subtitling or
on-the-fly subtitling of live programmes has come along leaps and bounds,
with voice recognition technology (which sometimes kicks up amusing
misunderstandings, but seems to work very well) - how long do you think
it'll be bef
I believe these guys do most/all of it...
http://www.redbeemedia.com/access/subtitling.shtml
I remember watching an excellent video that showed the typing re-reading
methods of subtitling. Can't find it right now, sorry.
Bonus link: whilst googling around I found this little gem (if you're a
font
[just saw jase's post, but dammit I've typed this out now, so I'm posting!]
Red Bee Media (née BBC Broadcast) does all our subtitling.
I was having a beer with someone who used to work in their subtitling area the
other day, and got an interesting explanation of how it works. They actually do
u
On 3/26/07, Brendan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pre-recorded subtitling works differently, obviously -- they can take time to
pause the playout and get it right. Most of these subtitlers are ex-courtroom
steganographers.
this may LOOK like just a gallery of cute kittens in boxes, but
Hello all,
Fantastic information - this is very interesting indeed. Thanks to
Kim for the bbc.co.uk information, Richard and Brain for their
information and James for the virginradio.co.uk and the other sites.
I think this allows us all to build up quite a clear picture of what
the 'avera
13 matches
Mail list logo
