At 00:36 +0100 21/2/07, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 20/02/07, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 15:18 + 19/2/07, Matthew Cashmore wrote:
Hi Gordon - nope an honest as you like Creative Commons Licence - no BBC
fudge at all.
I was thinking of the Creative Archive Licence which is a BBC
On 21/02/07, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave. Now I understand. This is a major step
Yes, Ian and Matthew are really showing how things should be done! :-)
--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
Hi Gordon :-)
We're using Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 - details here
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
m
Why not the new version of the Attribution license? (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ )
Is there a bit difference?
jonh
On 20/02/07, John Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're using Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 - details here
Why not the new version of the Attribution license? (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ )
Is there a bit difference?
No, because you can upgrade CC licenses to the latest
On 20/02/07, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 15:18 + 19/2/07, Matthew Cashmore wrote:
Hi Gordon - nope an honest as you like Creative Commons Licence - no BBC
fudge at all.
I was thinking of the Creative Archive Licence which is a BBC fudge.
I'm not sure why you'd think this, or
The automation means that you don't lose any focus.
Erm right, I mean, apart from the time you spend building the
automation into your production process.
And then fixing it when it goes wrong.
And patching and sysadmining the servers running the automation.
And having someone who
- 643
WAV - 38
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Belam
Sent: 19 February 2007 09:15
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] First BBC Backstage Podcast: DRM and the BBC
The automation means that you don't lose any
On 2/14/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/02/07, David McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply point my
desk
antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record the 20Mbaud H.2641080p
stream being broadcast in clear.
This
On 2/13/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also note that its been published in the free software, open
standard, cross platform ogg vorbis format as well as MP3, and hope
this demonstrates that such formats do indeed exist - As I said in the
show, I think that everything the BBC is
On 18/02/07, James Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's possible for all our podcasts to be produced in Ogg Vorbis
automatically, too.
...
Ultimately, no organisation can spend time servicing 0.01% of people without
losing focus for the 99.99% of people.
The automation means that you
not *exactly*... the 'it was too popular for its own good' refers to
various local radio stations having their bandwidth soaked up due to
people downloading stuff... not good for business, that...
It didn't do much for productivity either as I recall - I think at the
point my team blagged two
Greetings,
Interesting discussion - primarily useful for the we don't have the rights
arguments that haven't been effectively aired until now.
The reason for using DRM has often been stated thus:
* We need to prevent our users from re-distributing content that we feed them.
However, it now
On 14/02/07, David McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply point my desk
antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record the 20Mbaud H.264 1080p
stream being broadcast in clear.
This is the kind of thing I think the BBC should be
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply point my desk
antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record the 20Mbaud H.264 1080p
stream being broadcast in clear.
This is the kind of thing I think the BBC should be telling rights holders :-)
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply
point my
desk antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record
the 20Mbaud
H.264 1080p stream being broadcast in clear.
This is the kind of thing I think the BBC should be telling
rights holders :-)
Perhaps we could
Hi Tom!
On 14/02/07, Tom Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply point my desk
antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record the 20Mbaud H.264 1080p
stream being broadcast in clear.
This is the kind of thing I think the BBC
On 14/02/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tom!
On 14/02/07, Tom Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, this seems particularly pointless when I can simply point my desk
antenna at the Crystal Palace transmitter and record the 20Mbaud H.264
1080p
stream being
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 16:56, Tom Loosemore wrote:
http://strange.corante.com/archives/2006/05/17/xtech_2006_tom_loosemore_tre
ating_digital_broadcast_as_just_another_api_and_other_such_ruminations.php
The link to Kamaelia Macro at the end of that post is broken, it should be:
*
And overnight we got Boingboing'ed -
http://www.boingboing.net/2007/02/12/bbc_techies_talk_drm.html
Off the bat, I would say Cory has taken some of the simple stuff and ran
with it... The debate was a lot more complex that suggested in BoingBoing
Cheers,
Ian
-
Sent via the
Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but will do. Does that mean
we don't have to carry on the debate here anymore ;-)
cheers,
martin
--
Martin Belam - http://www.currybet.net
On 13/02/07, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'd just like to say thanks to everyone who
Just finished listening to it, well worth my time; thanks for the good job,
and it seems that the BBC now finally has some fully free content (even if
it's only one podcastl; what makes a downloadable audio file into a podcast
anyway??) that's available under a recognised copyleft licence. The
I have managed to listen to the first minutes and then the stream
stops. can anyone share the mp3 with me? :-)
RichE
On 13 Feb 2007, at 11:53, Martin Belam wrote:
Haven't had a chance to listen to it yet, but will do. Does that mean
we don't have to carry on the debate here anymore ;-)
On 13/02/07, Richard P Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have managed to listen to the first minutes and then the stream
stops. can anyone share the mp3 with me? :-)
RichE
There are links to download it at the bottom of the blog post:
vijay chopra wrote:
(even if it's only one podcastl; what makes a downloadable audio file
into a podcast anyway??)
If this is going to be a (semi-)regular occurrence, could we get a real RSS feed
for it?
Cheers,
David
--
David McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Computing, Imperial
On 13/02/07, David McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is going to be a (semi-)regular occurrence, could we get a real RSS feed
for it?
Yes, I'd be in favour of that.
I also note that its been published in the free software, open
standard, cross platform ogg vorbis format as well as
On 13/02/07, David McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vijay chopra wrote:
(even if it's only one podcastl; what makes a downloadable audio file
into a podcast anyway??)
If this is going to be a (semi-)regular occurrence, could we get a real
RSS feed
for it?
Cheers,
David
I agree. I spent
On 13/02/07, John Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I spent a good few minutes looking for an RSS feed with the
podcast in it (there are loads of RSS feeds on the site) before just giving
up and grabbing the ogg.
The MSM (including the BBC) is guilty of doing this all the time,
Hi All,
Just in case you've not all heard or seen yet.
We recently convinced some of the key people from the DRM debate, to sit
around a table . We then recorded the results and have now made it
available under the creative commons attribution licence for you all to
use and remix to your
Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We recently convinced some of the key people from the DRM debate, to sit
around a table . We then recorded the results and have now made it
available under the creative commons attribution licence for you all to
use and remix to your hearts
29 matches
Mail list logo
