Hi,
Timothy J. Massey wrote on 29.01.2007 at 01:46:34 [[BackupPC-users] Submitting
an archive via BackupPC_serverMesg in a scriptable way]:
>
> Here are some notes on how to submit an archive job to BackupPC in the
> same way that the GUI does.
thank you for sharing the result of your research
"Joe Casadonte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007
10:42:32 PM:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
> > 07:01:03 PM:
> >
> > > Also, you might crank up the timeout settings for just the
> > > failing hosts and see if it allows
Tim writes:
> Is there a reason why archives made with "-1" as the backup number are
> saved as "-1" instead of the actual backup number that was used? If
> not, would you accept a patch that changes it to use the actual backup
> number instead (assuming I can figure out how to make the change
Jason writes:
> Willem Viljoen wrote:
> > I have inserted the username and password required to make backups and
> > it works, full and inrcremental. When turning "Use simple File Sharing"
> > of - incremental backups fail with the message: "backup failed (session
> > setup failed: NT_STATUS_LO
> BackupPC XferLog.0:
>
> # tail XferLog.0
>create 744 0/0 47604
> lib/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport.ko
>create 744 0/08716
> lib/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_cs.ko
> Read EOF: No route to host
"No route to host" in
I have installed the Windows rsync package, written my rsyncd.conf
files, configured the rsync containers, etc. When I command-line rsync
from the backuppc server, everything works fine. How do I now get
BackupPC to act as host to the rsync process, rather than executing it
remotely over ssh?
-
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007 06:31:03 PM:
>
> > Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> >
> > > lib/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_cs.ko
> > > Read EOF: No route to host
> >
> > That's an odd network error. What's between these boxes?
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007 06:31:03 PM:
> Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> > lib/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_cs.ko
> > Read EOF: No route to host
>
> That's an odd network error. What's between these boxes?
A switch and a couple of Ethernet cables
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
07:01:03 PM:
> Also, you might crank up the timeout settings for just the failing hosts
> and see if it allows your backups to run longer before failing. Your
> failures are right about 20 minutes into them, which is a suspiciously
> round number.
Actua
Willem Viljoen wrote:
> I have inserted the username and password required to make backups and
> it works, full and inrcremental. When turning "Use simple File Sharing"
> of - incremental backups fail with the message: "backup failed (session
> setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE)". My printer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe I shouldn't chime in, because I've only been half following this
> thread, but I can't help wondering if you've looked into all the
> firewall/timeout possibilities? Sometimes those settings get hosed during
> an upgrade too.
>
>
Not a bad thing to look into. I
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> lib/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/kernel/drivers/parport/parport_cs.ko
> Read EOF: No route to host
That's an odd network error. What's between these boxes?
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Tak
Maybe I shouldn't chime in, because I've only been half following this
thread, but I can't help wondering if you've looked into all the
firewall/timeout possibilities? Sometimes those settings get hosed during
an upgrade too.
ck
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>>
>>> Rememb
Les Mikesell wrote:
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
Remember, this happens on *3* different servers, with 3 different
BackupPC servers. This is *not* related to a unique property of the
individual server. This is *very* related to RHEL4, instead of
RHEL3.
Like I said, we upgraded a server from 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
04:54:36 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
> 03:10:18 PM:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
> > 02:40:59 PM:
> >
> > > I've tried older versions of rsync, I've tried newer version of
rsync.
> > > I've tried Red Hat's versio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
04:52:15 PM:
> Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> > Remember, this happens on *3* different servers, with 3 different
> > BackupPC servers. This is *not* related to a unique property of the
> > individual server. This is *very* related to RHEL4, instead of R
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> Remember, this happens on *3* different servers, with 3 different
> BackupPC servers. This is *not* related to a unique property of the
> individual server. This is *very* related to RHEL4, instead of RHEL3.
> Like I said, we upgraded a server from 3 to 4: used to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
03:10:18 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
> 02:40:59 PM:
>
> > I've tried older versions of rsync, I've tried newer version of rsync.
> > I've tried Red Hat's versions, I've tried generic versions. I've
tried
> > older versions of File::
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007 04:21:51 PM:
> Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> >
> > Another failure. And here's the log:
> >
> > 2007-01-29 13:41:49 full backup started for directory ROOT
> > 2007-01-29 14:19:55 Got fatal error during xfer (Child exited
prematurely)
> > 2
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> Another failure. And here's the log:
>
> 2007-01-29 13:41:49 full backup started for directory ROOT
> 2007-01-29 14:19:55 Got fatal error during xfer (Child exited prematurely)
> 2007-01-29 14:20:00 Backup aborted (Child exited prematurely)
> 2007-01-29 14:20:00 Save
"Joe Casadonte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007
02:39:52 PM:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> > So this should not be an issue. Am I missing something?
>
> Can you run rsync from the command line from the backuppc server
> hitting the client machine? Something l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
02:40:59 PM:
> I've tried older versions of rsync, I've tried newer version of rsync.
> I've tried Red Hat's versions, I've tried generic versions. I've tried
> older versions of File::RsyncD, I've tried newer versions of
> File::RsyncD. I've tried Rsyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
01:40:56 PM:
> > > Or, you could put the stock package back - the RHEL guys get
some of
> > > this stuff right...
> >
> > Well, the rsync package for RHEL4 didn't work, and *then* I
upgraded to
> > a standard rsync package. It's not like I rand
Hi,
My main backuppc file repository ran out of disk space last week. I had
it running on a software RAID 1 array, without LVM, a 120GB ext3 partition.
So over the weekend I put in two new 320GB drives, configured them for
(software) RAID 1, and created an LVM partition running there to ease
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/29/2007
01:25:06 PM:
> Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007 12:35:29 PM:
>
> > That's not the stock rsync package for RHEL4. The changed behavior of
> > rsync has been discussed on the list before in the context of distros
> > that include it:
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/29/2007 12:35:29 PM:
> Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> >
> > I have had a bug with BackupPC, rsync and RHEL4 for some time now. I
> > blindly assumed that this bug had been fixed in the last year or
so. It
> > turns out it has not.
> >
> > BackupPC
Ted To wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reading the documenation on host discovery, it's not clear to me how to set
> up my network so that backuppc knows what dhcp assigned IP address to
> associate with a linux box. Can someone offer some help or point me in the
> right direction?
The way I do this is via dyn
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
>>
>> My first question is: exaclty, when the backup are made? In which
>> time? I can't find this information, maybe somewere in config but I'm
>> sure I read fine it. I would like to know this for scheduling the pc
>> on network that must be open. This means that I
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
>
> I have had a bug with BackupPC, rsync and RHEL4 for some time now. I
> blindly assumed that this bug had been fixed in the last year or so. It
> turns out it has not.
>
> BackupPC Configuration:
> BackupPC 3.0beta3 running on CentOS 3.8 with latest updates
>
> Ho
DNS is done by my router. It has DNSmasq and I've now turned on local DNS
-- will that do the trick?
On 1/28/07, Holger Parplies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Ted To wrote on 23.01.2007 at 10:06:15 and on 27.01.2007 at 19:08:37
[[BackupPC-users] Backuppc host discovery for linux computers]:
Joe Skop wrote:
first thanks for this fine program. I discover it by HowToForge
yesterday, and I prepare and install immediatly.
My first question is: exaclty, when the backup are made? In which
time? I can't find this information, maybe somewere in config but I'm
sure I read fine it. I would l
Hi,
first thanks for this fine program. I discover it by HowToForge
yesterday, and I prepare and install immediatly.
My first question is: exaclty, when the backup are made? In which
time? I can't find this information, maybe somewere in config but I'm
sure I read fine it. I would like to know th
Hello!
I have had a bug with BackupPC, rsync and RHEL4 for some time now. I
blindly assumed that this bug had been fixed in the last year or so. It
turns out it has not.
BackupPC Configuration:
BackupPC 3.0beta3 running on CentOS 3.8 with latest updates
# uname -a
Linux vault.example.com 2.
Hi,
Jim McNamara wrote on 29.01.2007 at 10:55:26 [Re: [BackupPC-users] how to
update from 2.1.1]:
> Due to the code freeze in Debian for the release of Etch as stable
> "soon", it will be quite a while before a new deb package for backupPC
> makes it to stable.
true.
> The Debian backupPC maint
Due to the code freeze in Debian for the release of Etch as stable
"soon", it will be quite a while before a new deb package for backupPC
makes it to stable. The Debian backupPC maintainer is probably well
aware of the releases, but even if he made the packages, the code
freeze would prevent them f
On 01/27 02:23 , Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> We are right now envisioning needing 2TB of space to back up a single
> host: our mail server, which has less than 100GB of data. The deltas
> on our mail server are currently in the neighborhood of 50GB/day.
> That's because we have 50GB of mail dat
Hi Christophe,
I would not really worry about an update. I have always updated without
a single problem and this since version 1 of BackupPC.
If you install BackupPC, untar the file in a new directory (for
backupreaasons if things go wrong, you should still have the old install
dir of your pr
Filipe wrote:
I've followed a guide and I used apt-get install... when installing
backuppc 2.1.1
and now what should I do?!
there's version 3 also out :o
You could contact the maintainer and ask if an update is in the works
or maybe use Debian's Bug Tracker. I'm pretty sure you can also
I've followed a guide and I used apt-get install... when installing
backuppc 2.1.1
and now what should I do?!
there's version 3 also out :o
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Filipe wrote:
I am running 2.1.1 with no major problems with 12 hosts for about 6
months.
It is on a debian sarge syste
How can I make per pc schedule for backup purpose.
As I had 350 pc and want to keep maximum 4 pc to be connected concurrent.
--
Nilesh Vaghela
ElectroMech
Redhat Channel Partner and Training Partner
74, Nalanda Complex, Satellite Rd, Ahmedabad
25, The Emperor, Fatehgunj, Baroda.
www.electromech.
Hi, just some more info about this.
I noticed that when a host had one user in BackupPC 2.1.2, and I add
more users after upgrade to version 3.0.0beta3, the line
"This PC is used by "
vanishes! Altering the line back to only one user, shows the line again.
This is not the case when a PC origina
41 matches
Mail list logo
