Re: [BackupPC-users] Western Digital Mybook drives

2008-08-12 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, May 16, 2008 3:52 PM -0500 Chris Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone used the Western Digital My Book studio drives with Linux? I haven't used the Studio model, but I use the USB 2 interface with CentOS 5 (an RHEL 5 re-spin). To allow cross-OS compatibility and large file

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Sunday, July 20, 2008 8:43 PM +0200 Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup. This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can identify.)

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Michael Pellegrino
This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can identify.) Because the client is native, it can store the native metadata (eg. Windows ACLs) more completely. The Bacula client also has native VSS support for backing up open files on Windows XP/2003. Mike

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Maarten te Paske
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:43:30PM +0200, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: Arch Willingham wrote: I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as compared to the other but found nothing very

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Maarten te Paske wrote: - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup. I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd. Most unix-like systems

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Maarten te Paske
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:03AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Maarten te Paske wrote: I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd. Most unix-like systems already have sshd, rsync and tar installed and windows can

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula

2008-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Maarten te Paske wrote: I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd. Most unix-like systems already have sshd, rsync and tar installed and windows can use the admin file shares for clientless backup. Even if you

[BackupPC-users] Backuppc doesn't back up all files on Vista machine

2008-08-12 Thread Steve Blackwell
Let me preface my questions by saying that I know just about nothing about Windows administration, never wanted to, never needed to before now, so this may well be a duh! question. I finially got backuppc to back up my wife's Vista computer using smb after I figured out that the user name that

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alan McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: let me rephrase that. If your XferLOG.0.z is really 101GB long, there is either something seriously wrong, you are backing up an insane amount of data, or your path names are all ridiculously long. I would guess something is

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backuppc doesn't back up all files on Vista machine

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
1) Why can't backuppc backup all the files when using smb as an administrator? I'm guessing at this one, but I do know that on Windows unlike Linux/UNIX, it is possible for a user to set perms on a file so that an admin cannot read it. -- I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends -

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backuppc doesn't back up all files on Vista machine

2008-08-12 Thread Jon Forrest
Alan McKay wrote: 1) Why can't backuppc backup all the files when using smb as an administrator? I'm guessing at this one, but I do know that on Windows unlike Linux/UNIX, it is possible for a user to set perms on a file so that an admin cannot read it. And, at least with Windows XP, it's

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
Alan McKay wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alan McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: let me rephrase that. If your XferLOG.0.z is really 101GB long, there is either something seriously wrong, you are backing up an insane amount of data, or your path names are all ridiculously long.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, Nils summed it up quite nicely. Alan McKay wrote on 2008-08-10 19:09:23 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web]: [...] Do you want to see my config file? No, I'm not really desperate about it. I've got my own config file. Whenever I feel the need to

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
I wouldn't know how others on this list could blindly wade through a 100 GB compressed logfile on your machine. I wasn't suggesting that for a moment. I'm saying there must be someone here who can tell me what to grep for in terms of error messages. Have you tried taking a look at the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
We just might be able to ask intelligent questions like why is your XferLogLevel so ridiculously high? or refrain from asking it if it doesn't apply. I'll refrain, knowing it isn't, because XferLogLevel = 1, There shouldn't be, so that's a start. My XferLog shows one

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
There shouldn't be, so that's a start. My XferLog shows one line per file. Give us a sample of the first several lines that don't look like that. Unless you've got XferLogLevel too high. Which you don't. OK, just a sec and I'll stick a sample up on my website so as not to clutter up the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan McKay wrote: We just might be able to ask intelligent questions like why is your XferLogLevel so ridiculously high? or refrain from asking it if it doesn't apply. I'll refrain, knowing it isn't, because XferLogLevel =

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
Perhaps some people are being a little obtuse (ie, not as obvious or direct, or perhaps sarcastic)... Judging by what you are about to say, yes, I'd agree. Thanks Adam! Send the output of: grep -v ^\# config.pl to the list. I'll stick it onto my website momentarily and post a link. You

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Alan McKay wrote: Does authentication work, i.e. are you authenticated as a user listed in /etc/BackupPC/hosts for the host in question? The AuthName directive seems to be missing a quote, but I'm no apache expert, so I can't tell you if that is a problem or not. Good eye! Yeah, auth

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
Send the output of: grep -v ^\# config.pl to the list. I'll stick it onto my website momentarily and post a link. http://www.alanmckay.com/BackupPC.config.pl.txt -- I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends - Abraham Lincoln

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
But are you authenticating as the owner of that PC (in hosts) or an admin user ($Conf{CgiAdminUsers}=). If not, you aren't supposed to be able to see the backups. Thanks Les for the response! The hosts entry looks like this : alanpc 0 amckay2 amckay Which as I understand means

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Alan McKay
OK, I see this is likely the cause of the huge logs : $Conf{XferLogLevel} = 99; Which I now recall having set early on in my debugging when I was trying to get more info on my problem. I'll set it back to 1 now and re-try a backup, and see where we get from there. -- I destroy my enemies when

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Adam Goryachev wrote: Perhaps some people are being a little obtuse (ie, not as obvious or direct, or perhaps sarcastic)... The problem is that you haven't posted anything useful to diagnose what is wrong - and when you find it you'll probably know what it was yourself... In your pc/hostname

Re: [BackupPC-users] FW: trash folder

2008-08-12 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Williams wrote: Resend Regards, David Williams _ *From:* David Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 12,

Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups seem to work, but don't show up in web

2008-08-12 Thread John Rouillard
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:15:41PM -0400, Alan McKay wrote: I wouldn't know how others on this list could blindly wade through a 100 GB compressed logfile on your machine. I wasn't suggesting that for a moment. I'm saying there must be someone here who can tell me what to grep for in